Skip to comments.Draconian Anti-Piracy Censorship Bill Passes Senate Committee (PROTECT-IP Act)
Posted on 05/26/2011 4:30:49 PM PDT by Smogger
The controversial PROTECT IP Act unanimously passed the Senate Judiciary Committee today. When the PROTECT IP Act becomes law U.S. authorities and copyright holders will have the power to seize domains, block websites and censor search engines to prevent copyright infringements. Introduced just two weeks ago, the bill now heads over to the Senate for further consideration and another vote.
The U.S. Government continues to back legislation that opens the door to unprecedented Internet censorship.
Two weeks ago a group of U.S. senators proposed legislation to make it easier to crack down on so-called rogue websites, and today the Senates Judicial Committee unanimously approved the bill.
When the PROTECT IP Act becomes law the authorities can legitimately seize any domain name they deem to be facilitating copyright infringement. All thats required to do so is a preliminary order from the court. But thats just the start, the bill in fact provides a broad range of censorship tools.
In case a domain is not registered or controlled by a U.S. company, the authorities can also order search engines to remove the website from its search results, order ISPs to block the website, and order ad-networks and payment processors to stop providing services to the website in question.
Backers of the bill argue that the PROTECT IP Act is needed as an extension of the already controversial domain seizures. As reported previously, it is now relatively easy for a seized website to continue operating under a new non-US based domain name.
Not everyone agrees with this stance. Yesterday several Internet giants including Google, Yahoo, eBay and American Express asked the Senate Committee not to adopt the bill, warning it would undoubtedly inhibit innovation and economic growth.
However, the concerns raised by the companies did not affect the vote today.
Today the Judiciary Committee took an important step in protecting online intellectual property rights. The Internet is not a lawless free-for-all where anything goes, commented Senator Orrin Hatch. The Constitution protects both property and speech, both online and off.
The PROTECT IP Act targets the most egregious actors, and is an important first step to putting a stop to online piracy and the sale of counterfeit goods, Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said commenting on the importance of the bill.
Both law enforcement and rights holders are currently limited in the remedies available to combat websites dedicated to offering infringing content and products. These rogue websites are often foreign-owned and operated, or reside at domain names that are not registered through a U.S.-based registry or registrar, Leahy added.
Similar comments were made by the other Committee members and the various entertainment industry lobby groups.
For Hollywood and the major record labels the PROTECT IP Act is the legislation they have dreamed of for a long time. It allows for copyright holders to obtain a court orders to seize a domain, or prevent payment providers and ad-networks from doing business with sites that allegedly facilitate copyright infringement. All without due process.
The PROTECT IP Act will now move on to the Senate where its expected to be opposed by Senator Ron Wyden, who also stopped the bills predecessor COICA, fearing it would stifle free speech. Whether it will be enough to prevent the legislation from becoming law has yet to be seen.
The Chinese got nothing on us. It's only a matter of time before you come to FR and see:
All the RINOs will no doubt be on board for this
I am surprised that this was not attached to the new “Patriot act” as a way to “fight terrorism”...
I disagree with the Admin that the source http://torrentfreak.com/
is a “blog” as it were.
Too bad it will sail through Congress. Even this post was relegated to “blog” status. :-(
If you mean Leftwingtard that gives a better idea of what you are up to.
BTW, for all its promises this particular piece of legislation will NOT improve the bottom line for the record companies. The successful business models do not include "copies" as relevant artifacts ~
There is little to no information regarding this legislation and it seems like its right down the govt alley to shut a place like Freerepublic down. What gives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.