You have asked the prefect ‘rhetorical question’.
The plot (fraud) thickens.
It would interesting if a woman could take down the President.
This entity has a certain way of operating and they never change, apparently. It wouldn’t matter to them if it was allegedly already in the public domain by some other route or not in the public domain. That’s my impression.
KB explained the wacky form they released in a post, last night iirc. He says it is an abstract, which perfectly accounts for all the layers, white halos, differently sized pixels, etc. etc. Meaning, we got a doctored, sanitized, Obama-approved ‘abstract’, but by NO means did we catch a glimpse of the original birth records. We know from Fukino and Abercrombie that they look nothing like what we saw [’half handwritten’ ‘a notation’ ‘something written down’].
Bottom line: we still have no idea what was on the original, handwritten record. HI gave us the final generation, so to speak, outcome that Obama wanted. IF Taitz succeeds—and I’m betting one way or another she will not—the info on the original form will NOT match the abstract. Of that, there really is no doubt.
I love it!....
Now that Obama has allegedly released his birth certificate, on what grounds does the HI DOH refuse access?
I DON’T KNOW!!
My two cents.....
Knock, Knock!
Who DAT!
K E N Y A!
K E N Y A Who?
K E N Y A please show us your “real” Birth Certificate, Mr. Obama..
K E N Y A!
I have a really good answer for you. It just now occurred to me that Obama, by releasing what he claims to be his birth certificate, has made that document public knowledge and has by default consented to the release of that information. In other words he no longer has an expectation of privacy concerning that document. SO, a subpoena can reach that document because there is no privilege left for him to exercise to prevent it. Hawaii has no privilege or privacy rights only Obama does. Now that he has “released it” the State shouldn’t have grounds to quash.