“Pro se” just would mean she is representing herself.
I know what ‘pro se’ means. But is she a member of the USDC-DC bar? I tend to think not. And, if not, she would not be an authorized “issuing officer” as called for to issue a subpoena, would she?
I’d bet m bottom dollar this will get quashed in any case.
I know what ‘pro se’ means. But the question is: is she a member of the USDC-DC bar? I tend to think not. And, if not, she’s not an “officer of [this] court,” and would not be an authorized “issuing officer” as called for to issue a subpoena, would she?
IIRC, a pro se litigant can’t issue subpoenas by him/herself. It wouldn’t matter whatever other court(s) she’s admitted to if not the one where the subpoena is being issued. Wouldn’t this court itself would have to issue the subpoena for a pro se litigant who is not a member of the court’s bar?
I’d bet my bottom dollar this will get quashed in any case.