I know what ‘pro se’ means. But is she a member of the USDC-DC bar? I tend to think not. And, if not, she would not be an authorized “issuing officer” as called for to issue a subpoena, would she?
I’d bet m bottom dollar this will get quashed in any case.
I know what ‘pro se’ means. But is she a member of the USDC-DC bar? I tend to think not. And, if not, she would not be an authorized “issuing officer” as called for to issue a subpoena, would she?
I’d bet m bottom dollar this will get quashed in any case.
She has active case in this particular court doesn’t she? So she is not an officer of the court? The tell me how she was allowed to lead the case?