The Associated Press Shows Pro-Obama Bias to The Post & Email, Inc.

The Post & Email ^ | May 23, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau

[ml/nj]

You might read the stamp. It says "true copy or abstract." Judging by the Nordyke BCs, I would say the attempt here was to forge a "true copy."

ML/NJ

[SatinDoll]

I agree with your statement about the First Amendment.

Its only limitation is that a rich man can corrupt the media, interfere with the free political expression so necessary to keeping citizens informed of corruption in their midst. “Traditional journalistic standards and ethics”, as you’ve stated, have been turned on its head.

The Founders, I believe, understood the importance to our Republic of open discourse. Trying to get out the facts about Obama and his true history is very difficult with a media which no longer has ethics nor standards. As every day passes it becomes more obvious how intertwined the Constitutional amendments really are and the freedom to expose corruption through the First Amendment keeps the others safe.

The requirement of a natural born citizen as President, we now know, served a purpose. Too bad the nation is being shredded over that lesson.

[Hotlanta Mike]

IN CASE YOU MISSED THIS...

Orly Taitz has obtained a subpoena from the United States District Court in the District of Columbia in the case Taitz v. Astrue for Ms. Fuddy to appear in person for deposition together with the original document. The appearance is set for June 27th at 10:00 am...

“Subpoena for Loretta Fuddy, director of HI Health Department”

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22089

[American Constitutionalist]

( The Associated Press Shows Pro-Obama Bias )

And this is supposed to be surprising to anyone of us ?

[TheBigJ]

Thanks for posting

[American Constitutionalist]

" On top of that, the Obots are talking total nonsense intended to confuse and disrupt this assault. "

The Obamanoids would find a reason, or a fault in why a fly shouldn't be sitting on a turd.

[Texas Fossil]

Yep, I agree.

[Texas Fossil]

Wasn't the white paper copy received by the AP and scanned by them and placed on their web site?

That is correct. And the document they scanned does not appear to be tampered with in the scanning process. And it has notations in the .pdf indicating who actually scanned it and what software produced the .pdf

I can post that info if you like, I posted here several times over the last few weeks. It is a RDF XML type of .pdf, with very clear info inside about it's creation. Does that mean it is an authentic document, NO.