Posted on 05/23/2011 9:02:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
About a year ago, I thought a Daniels-Ryan GOP ticket for the 2012 presidential race would have been ideal. Alas, Gov. Mitch Daniels is not running for the presidency. Neither is Haley Barbour, Mike Huckabee, Donald Trump, Mike Pence, John Thune, or Jim DeMint. Chris Christie, Rick Perry, and Jeb Bush probably won’t run either. Paul Ryan would still make a good VP choice, but he isn’t running for president.
Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, and Rick Santorum are all “dark horse” candidates. They stand little chance. Jon Huntsman is too liberal (and was in the Obama administration). Newt Gingrich’s campaign is already in trouble. Sarah Palin, I think, knows this isn’t her time.
That leaves Tim Pawlenty and Mitt Romney. Lame, I know. But Pawlenty’s lamer. Against President Obama, I will take Mitt Romney. Furthermore, Romney’s running mate should be Rep. Allen West. Romney-West 2012 would be very formidable. Let’s start with Romney.
We know Romney’s downfalls. He’s Ward Cleaver. Too clean. He’s “inauthentic,” an “establishment” politician. That’s unpopular these days. GOP primary voters want someone real, someone outside of politics; a self-made citizen reluctantly running for public office to save the day. Romney, on the other hand, has been running for president for six years. Then there is Romney’s health care bill which he passed in Massachusetts as governor. President Obama loves to thank and jibe Romney for setting the example on health care reform. It makes Obama’s awful health insurance law look moderate and undermines conservative criticism of it.
All this and more is true. But consider Romney’s strengths. He’s well known. He’s electable. He polls well against Obama. He looks and acts “presidential” (whatever that means). He’s been a governor of a state, an executive in the private sector, and he ran the 2002 Olympics in Salt Lake City. He’s disciplined, articulate, and well-versed in domestic and foreign policy. Romney will be quick to hit Obama on jobs and the economy, on the debt and deficit. When Obama holds Osama bin Laden’s scalp in front of the cameras, Romney won’t hesitate to say, “Yes, Mr. President. Good job. Now let’s talk about how the intelligence that was used for the operation was gathered.”
With Daniels out, Romney’s the frontrunner. And yet he doesn’t seem to be preferred by much of anyone. He can fix that a number of ways. First, he ought to “go big” on foreign policy. Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Israel, China –– these are the issues, yes. But the big issue is our standing in the world. Obama has made it weaker. Romney ought to go big on domestic issues, as well. Unemployment and taxes are a problem. But entitlement insolvency is the heart of the matter. Fiscal issues are a worry. But monetary issues are paramount. Will someone other than Ron Paul ever speak about monetary policy? The opening for Romney is there to seize.
On health care and other issues, he must prove to conservatives that they will be able to hold a President Romney’s feet to the fire. Romney must clarify and champion his newfound federalism. He must promise to repeal ObamaCare. Period. He must seek to win over some of the libertarian-wing of the Republican Party with a sincere defense of states’ rights. That means getting with the times and not being an obstinate idiot about the drug war. That means respecting the Tenth Amendment.
Additionally, if nominated, Romney must pick a running mate who will please conservatives. That someone is Rep. Allen West.
Sure, West is only a first-term congressman. But Americans want an outsider, a Mr. Smith-goes-to-Washington kind of guy. Allen West is just that. He’s a retired Army lieutenant colonel, an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran, with as sharp of a mind as there is in Congress. He’s a conservative’s conservative; a tea-party favorite. But he cannot be smeared as a radical kook. He’s from swing state Florida — and Florida, remarkably, has never had a candidate on a national ticket. West is also black (not that it matters, but to some, it does). Far from the liberal caricature, we live in a country where that is, by far, a net gain — especially for a black conservative.
Allen West speaks with authority like nobody else in politics. Sometimes his rhetoric on his military service can be self-congratulatory, almost Pattonesque. And that’s slightly cliché in some corners of 2011 America. But it’s not insincere. One listens to him speak and it is evident that they are listening to a leader. West is a man for these times.
Most interestingly — and importantly, to me — West understands the true nature of the Islamist adversary and has not bought into the “cult of counterinsurgency” when it comes to military operations. “We have to get away from occupation, nation-building style warfare,” he said last November. Yes!
And listen to him speak on the enemy. They are not perverting their holy texts, he insists. They are heeding them. More yes! Politically incorrect, no doubt. But true, unafraid, and rooted in reality. Allen West is one of the few politicians in the country who has challenged the Council on American-Islamic Relations for its ties to terrorism. He understands the full scope and scale of the fight ahead. But with that in mind, he is nevertheless committed to avoiding attritional, unending, unwinnable wars.
Romney-West can stand toe-to-toe with Obama-Biden in the debates, on foreign and economic policy, on substance, on style, and with the general electorate. With the 24-hour news cycle and viral video exposure, vice presidential running mates matter more nowadays. They don’t come much better than Allen West. Romney, the electable-establishment candidate, and West, the tea-party war-vet rock star, complement each other very well. Together, they would be the toughest GOP ticket to beat in the 2012 election.
Not necessarily. If you can give the creased pants Republican crowd a candidate who also appeals to disaffected liberals, they’ll peel away Dem voters from Obama and do a reverse of Perot. Kind of like what happened in Florida 2010.
____________________________________
OK, I'll bite...prove it.
Yeah, sure, he dressed it up in Republican buzz words and called for tax cuts, but it's all the same crap. Zero called for tax cuts too and was about as sincere as Romney.
And by the way, anyone who thinks for a second that the man who inflicted Romneycare on MA is a free market capitalist, is either hopelessly ignorant or a complete blithering idiot.
That leaves Tim Pawlenty and Mitt Romney. Lame, I know. But Pawlenty’s lamer.
Pawlenty isn't perfect, but he's won twice, is pro-life, pro-gun, and is more consistent than Mitt.
We know Romney’s downfalls. He’s Ward Cleaver. Too clean. He’s “inauthentic,” an “establishment” politician. That’s unpopular these days.
I don't think Romney's all that clean myself. Anyone who straps his dog to a roof of a car isn't a stand up guy. Inauthentic folks I don't trust. I can't count on Mitt.
He’s well known. He’s electable. He polls well against Obama.
How is he "electable?" Says who? He couldn't beat MCCAIN. He probably couldn't beat Huckabee one on one. With Daniels out, Romney’s the frontrunner.
We haven't even gotten to the Ames straw poll yet.
Romney ought to go big on domestic issues, as well. Unemployment and taxes are a problem. But entitlement insolvency is the heart of the matter. Fiscal issues are a worry. But monetary issues are paramount. Will someone other than Ron Paul ever speak about monetary policy? The opening for Romney is there to seize.
And Romney's got one big problem. His fiscal policy was bad as governor. Money talks. BS walks.
On health care and other issues, he must prove to conservatives that they will be able to hold a President Romney’s feet to the fire. Romney must clarify and champion his newfound federalism. He must promise to repeal ObamaCare. Period. He must seek to win over some of the libertarian-wing of the Republican Party with a sincere defense of states’ rights. That means getting with the times and not being an obstinate idiot about the drug war. That means respecting the Tenth Amendment.
This is wishful thinking. Why would Romney be anything but what he was in the 08 campaign or governor. He spent the whole time saying "I'm conservative too" and used gay marriage of all things as his issue. He then reiterated his gun grabbing ways. Drug war? Forget it.
If it's Pawlenty v Romney v the current field, Pawlenty over Romney easily.
That's about my attitude. Right now I'm at pro-life, pro-gun, somewhat maybe reasonable on fiscal (really hurting there), not Romney, and who can win.
Unless someone like a Pence changes his mind, I think Pawlenty may be the best we got.
I'll give you the other side of that argument. Here in Michigan, the people elected a Republican house, senate, and supposedly governor. Rick Snyder was viewed as a RINO who won because conservatives split their vote four-five ways.
Snyder, with a super majority, RAISES OUR TAXES and is running this state into the ground the same way his predecessor, Jenny Granholm did. If Granholm proposed this tax increase, it would be died quickly, but because Snyder is in charge, the sheeple follow him due to an R.
If I got a choice between big government Romney and big Government Obama, what the hell difference does it make? Both harm the country. One also destroys my party. It took us a lot of luck to recover from Bush's spending.
No Romney. Period. I don't need "President Snyder."
Or a guy who has a guy cut from the same cloth and same circle of friends as my RINO governor. Rick Snyder sucks. He's Granholm II with an "R" next to his name, and even donated to Dingleberry.
I am not in any way endorsing romney as a preferred candidate but in no way is he worse or as bad for America than four more years of obama. I feel the same about Bachmann, Palin, Newt, Guiliani, Cain et alia. I don’t think any of them is qualified.
Yes. So be it.
Then join the Obama team. That will help defeat Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.