Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sometime lurker

“If someone gives a clear answer, with links or citations, I wouldn’t need to keep asking. An opinion is not an answer.”

This is where you need to step back for a minute and take in the BIG PICTURE.

If people wanted to determine whether Obama’s mother was in Kenya on August 4, 1961 -—they wouldn’t do it by looking at Airline Brochures from 1961. Or try to convert British pounds to dollars and try to estimate the cost. They would just go look at a copy of her passport.

BUT, those records are not available for whatever reason. Like almost all of Obama’s records. Sooo, if you want to get mad because there aren’t definite answers to things, that is your right. But why don’t you get mad at Obama for not releasing stuff. Or Obama’s Hospital. Or his sister.

Because the BIG PICTURE QUESTION is, why are we having to guess at all this stuff in the first place and try to wiggle into answers???

ANSWER: Obama has hid his records. NEXT QUESTION: Why???


631 posted on 05/21/2011 10:41:33 PM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies ]


To: Squeeky

Bingo! Ann’s passport records are supposed to be public information. Why are we not allowed to see it?

The whole Kenya theory could be blown to bits by a genuine copy of her passport records showing she had no passport in 1961. But they won’t do that, even though they are REQUIRED to disclose those records. Instead, they (apparently) forge a “cable” claiming that the retention period for passport records was changed and millions of records were destroyed without leaving any of the required paper trail - and records that should have supposedly been destroyed (but not related to Obama) were easily found and disclosed.

The people in the Passport Office know. What we need to know is not only what are in the records they are illegally hiding, but also what sticks and carrots were used to get them to apparently commit perjury in order to cover for Obama.


708 posted on 05/22/2011 8:27:43 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

To: Squeeky

You’re right that things that might give better answers are not being released, and that’s a legitimate concern. However, it doesn’t justify claiming something as established fact, or even highly probable, when it’s an unlikely speculation.

Don’t get me wrong, speculation can be valuable. But over the years I’ve been following this, I’ve seen too many “This could have happened,” turn to “I’ll bet this is what happened,” and a month later become “This happened, I read it on a thread,” with no evidence cited.


715 posted on 05/22/2011 8:39:20 AM PDT by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson