Yes, I would. Quite frankly, I'm not sympathetic to Lakin. He was a military officer who disobeyed a lawful order to deploy through his chain of command. Military justice was served.
Because it is so lawful for a brigade commander to give combat orders without authorization from the chain of command beginning with a Constitutional Commander-in-Chief, the only person authorized by Congress via the Authorization for the Use of Force...
/s
>> “He was a military officer who disobeyed a lawful order to deploy through his chain of command. Military justice was served.” <<
.
Will military justice be served when hundreds of military officers obey the unlawful order to go house to house confiscating guns and ammunition?
The order Lakin had the courage to disobey came down an illegitimate chain of command with a pretender at its top.
Sounds real good - - until you consider that his oath was to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Larkin exhausted all available options asking the simple question: please release your original birth certificate,(signed by the MD who delivered the #$%^&((*&%$^Y#W!!) and was stonewalled, then railroaded to prison.
He was faithful to his oath. He refused to obey an order that has NOT been established as lawful because the _resident is most likely NOT a "mative born citizen". (And I believe BO was born in Hawaii, but his father was not a US citizen.)