Palin appointed a director of Planned Parenthood (can't get more liberal than that) to Alaska's Supreme Court.
Is that evidence that she is not fit for the presidency?
btw...I will not read any more private messages from you so answer here or ignore the question if you can't answer.
“You wrote that Daniels having appointed this judge is evidence that he is not fit for the presidency.
Palin appointed a director of Planned Parenthood (can’t get more liberal than that) to Alaska’s Supreme Court.
Is that evidence that she is not fit for the presidency?”
As I said, your smear of Palin isn’t a defense of the Daniel’s action, no matter how you spin it. Even if we take your polemic seriously, how does a smear against her make HIM more qualified or less suspect? How does your mention of her excuse his own action? Your own polemic undermines your defense, or attempt to uphold, him. If your point is to say she did the same rotten thing thing as he did, how does that negate my point he’s not fit? If you say it makes her unfit, then why doesn’t it prove he’s also equally unfit?