This is by far the most explanatory article I've seen regarding this power play mess by Obama and the NLRB.
1 posted on
05/12/2011 11:12:23 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
To: ken5050; DallasDeb
Pinging you to this excellent piece, it explains the entire legal process as well as the pathetic action of the NLRB.
3 posted on
05/12/2011 11:20:53 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
If Boeing loses in the NLRB kangaroo court, they need to announce that the jobs will not be created anywhere in the United States, then let the word leak out that they are looking for an overseas site. Once we get rid of the thug in our White House and replace him with a real president who believes in the rule of law (which such a Boeing announcement would help us to do), they can open the factory as scheduled . . . and start moving to eliminate their remaining union jobs so they don’t have to face the union thugs again.
4 posted on
05/12/2011 11:23:37 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: sionnsar; upchuck
5 posted on
05/12/2011 11:24:08 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Oh well, who is John Galt?
6 posted on
05/12/2011 11:24:12 AM PDT by
Sertorius
(A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
To: jazusamo
As I posted on another thread, Boeing chose to become an arm of the Federal Government a long time ago - to protect their market share from foreign competition. In no way can they be considered a free-market capitalist entity. This is just the true owners asserting their rights.
It does set a horrible precedent, and I have no doubt the NLRB will also try to do this in the future to real free-market enterprises. But shed no tears for Boeing - they made their choice long ago.
9 posted on
05/12/2011 11:31:37 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
( "The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." - Rowan Atkinson)
To: jazusamo
Why not just call them communists instead of Radical Pro-Unionists?
To: jazusamo
Daley was on Boeing’s board of directors...
For for the life of me I don't understand why a hack like Daley is on Boeing's BOD? What does this clown know about anything relating to the aircraft industry? We also know that Al Gore is on the Apple BOD. Again, why?
12 posted on
05/12/2011 11:44:37 AM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: jazusamo
At a time of extremely high unemployment, the Obama administration is filing suit against a company to prevent them from offering new jobs.
To: jazusamo
Federal law allows states to compete for new investment by implementing labor laws that prohibit workers from being forced to join unions. This is a poorly worded sentence. You do not prohibit someone from being forced to do something. You prohibit one party from forcing another party to do something. States are allowed to implement laws that PROTECT workers from being forced to join unions.
To: jazusamo; l8pilot; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; ...
South Carolina
Ping
Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.19 posted on
05/12/2011 12:41:22 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
To: jazusamo
It’s as if this issue was taken directly from the pages of Atlas Shrugged.
Mark
21 posted on
05/12/2011 1:42:20 PM PDT by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson