Apparently you haven't, or you'd notice that JUST TO THE LEFT of what you think is a BC number there's another number called FILE NUMBER.
When was that number put there? Why do each of the BCs we ever seen have one?
Do you have any idea what part that number plays in the grand scheme of things or are you merely advancing on the theory that the BIGGEST NUMBER must necessarily be a BC number?
Since we've never gotten an answer on that question on any of the threads I suggest that since it's so important to your line of reasoning that YOU GO FIND OUT WHAT IT'S FOR.
Apparently you haven't, or you'd notice that JUST TO THE LEFT of what you think is a BC number there's another number called FILE NUMBER.
When was that number put there? Why do each of the BCs we ever seen have one?
Do you have any idea what part that number plays in the grand scheme of things or are you merely advancing on the theory that the BIGGEST NUMBER must necessarily be a BC number?
Since we've never gotten an answer on that question on any of the threads I suggest that since it's so important to your line of reasoning that YOU GO FIND OUT WHAT IT'S FOR.
ping for later.
Here’s a BC# 151-1961-010637.
The 151 is pre-printed. It is a code for a birth record. For late birth certificates the preprinted number is L151, as evidenced by a blank copy of a late BC that I got directly from the HDOH via a UIPA request.
The next number is the year of issue - or, as the HDOH Administrative Rules refer to it, the “volume number”. Before the Y2K issue that was a 2-digit number (61 - as the Nordyke long-forms show); now it is 4-digit (1961 - as shown on both of the Obama forgeries and on other COLB/BC’s printed since 2000).
When I refer to the BC# I refer to the last of those 3 hyphenated numbers because that is the number that changes with each different BC.
The current CDC-recommended birth certificate says that the number is supposed to have 6 digits and have leading 0’s to fill in digits not yet reached in the sequential numbering. (So the first # would be 000001). When I refer to the numbers I usually leave off the leading zeroes just to make it easier to immediately see what number the BC is.
If you think I would spout off about this stuff without even knowing what those numbers represent then you have obviously never read any of my work, which seems like a lazy man’s way to check out my claims.
But thanks for bringing this to my attention. I had forgotten that some people may not know this yet. It’s been so long since that issue was first raised and answered that I had forgotten all about it.