I would think she actually has a RESPONSIBILITY to report a known forgery to law enforcement. To fail to report a felony is misprision of that felony, as I understand it - which is itself a felony.
But her saying what she did tells us clearly that we can’t count on her to publicly call Obama’s forgery what it is. Members of Congress and most of the public - myself included, until my research showed me otherwise - assumed that if a forgery was presented, the HDOH would have said something to disown the forgery. But they’ve already told us they never would.
So if we’re thinking we’re safe because that alarm hasn’t sounded, we would do well to know that the batteries are removed from that alarm and it is deader than a doornail. The absence of an alarm from the HDOH tells us nothing.
However, their law-breaking in a multitude of ways in order to cover for Obama DOES tell us something, IMHO. It tells us that they will not only fail to alert us to forgeries (as Okubo openly admitted with her response), they will also actively COVER UP forgeries.
Suppose, hypothetically, that you had absolute proof that Obama was not born in the U.S. or had formally renounced his citizenship, but such proof was not in any form that could be shown to anyone else. What would be the proper thing for you to do about it? Regardless of whether Obama is factually eligible for the presidency, I would think one's energies would at this point be much better spent on getting him kicked out for stuff that can be proven (I think GunWalker would be a clear basis for impeachment, e.g. given that Obama has, before and since, tried to politically profit by it in his demands for records of rifle sales).