[LeGrande]

According to what moral law do you make *THAT* pronouncement?

Moral Law? I use reason and logic. I simply look at the facts and use common sense. It is easy, you should try it sometime.

you might note that Jesus was *way* ahead of you on that one: and indeed, provided a route from judgement to mercy.

The problem with Christ's followers were that they bought into the original fallacy. If there is no original sin that brought death into the world (and there wasn't) then the purpose of Christ's resurrection is meaningless.

Religion loves fabricating solutions for fabricated problems.

[grey_whiskers]

Moral Law? I use reason and logic. I simply look at the facts and use common sense. It is easy, you should try it sometime.

What is common sense?

How do you define it?

You know, the attempted reductio ad infinitum which atheists attempt to use on believers.

It's funny how atheists suck themselves off over their superiority: claim that this superiority is manifested by the believer's inability to play the infinite regression game to justify the faith; and then resort to trivial bullsh*t to avoid answering similar questions on their *own* behalf.

You are more of a hypocrite than the Christians, for they at least can claim mercy from God; but there is NO mercy from the brights for intellectual failure or inconsistency.

Nice try, troll-boy.

Cheers!