ping!
I’m 1/2 way through. Very interesting. And thanks for the explanations too!
Great work, but it will go wasted on the anti-birthers.
Well done. Now what?
Now, now, everybody on all the networks, news programs, and talk radio accept the BC’s authenticity.
Why should we be the oddballs?
/s
Stop being a racist! Stop being a birther! This whole thing with defending the Constitution is just a distraction from the important issues!!!!! I think that about covers the basic comments you will see in this thread from those who don’t care about the greatest Constitutional crisis of our time.
Ping!
I’m sure that all the kerning and layering were done for the specific purpose of keeping the controversy going. Obama’s cynical gift to those who wish to focus on this issue.
Your page 4...comparing the Nordykes BC Oahu and barrys Oahu, good catch.
The following is the link to the post. It is **very** interesting. The author points out that the letters used in the document would have been impossible to produce with a manual typewriter or even an electric typewriter.
bttt
This deserves a ping to the list.
This is an excellent post and simple to understand. The image posted by the White House is a blatant forgery.
I have read a lot of the examinations of this, but I like how you did your own and yours had no speculation. Just facts. And yours was the first one I’ve read, as a non expert, that explained that this document uses both old manual typewriter AND computerized fonts.
You have proven that this document was cobbled together. The others used the layers to say that, but then experts debunked that line of argument. I don’t think that anyone can rationally explain why the document has both old typewritten letters and computerized fonts Within The Same Words.
Good job!!
Nicely done. It’s good to have a variety of opinions on this. And this adds a few new points that I haven’t seen mentioned.
In my experience, copies taken from rolls of microfilm are flat not curved. The film is placed between two pieces of glass and projected on a screen/viewer so the image can be sized by moving the lens, focused by turning a lever which adjusts focus, and also aligned up and down and right and left in the center of the viewing screen and then a copy can be made.
I believe the rounding would have to be from the original filming of the document (possibly in a book) not from using the roll of microfilm. Either that or from making a current copy without taking the book apart. (why not?) I would like to know how the books of BC are “bound” usually they would have removable pages held together between front and back covers with binding posts and screws...in other words they individual pages could be seperated from the “book” to be copied. Did Hawaii cut corners on this part of the original microfilming? Did they do it this way to give the impression to the public that the “bound” books cannot have pages removed? If that is so, show us a picture of the book and tell us when the book was permanently bound. Hawaii should have videotaped the whole process from locating the book (in a vault?) to locating the document and showing exactly how they copied it. EPIC FAIL
It amazes me this document has a hand stamp showing it to be a true copy or abstract when by all rights Hawii should have had Dr. Onaka hand sign the document as certified..did they use the hand stamp because it allows for the two options, 1) true copy or 2) abstract and that and signing by hand would have to choose one or the other?
Hawaii still sucks on this issue and has not unmuddied the waters and all Obama has done is thrown fuel on the fire by presenting this document to the public.
The incompetence and/or corruption of our governments scares the heck out of me..Imagine if their is a real document could they have done a worse job of presenting it to the public if they tried?
Wow, go and help at a soup kitchen, volunteer at church or to clean a park if you have so much time to waste.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt-2xzDMOjc
Perhaps one should try to analyze the document at post 5 here?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2713092/posts
There may be server limitations...OR he’s been Google zapped, but it’s not loading.