Posted on 04/23/2011 8:39:17 PM PDT by RobinMasters
By Ann Barnhardt: - I can't believe I'm actually going to say this, but I am starting to feel a teensy-weensy bit of respect for Donald Trump. Finally, someone in the mainstream is saying the things that need to be said about Obama's fake nativity story. To clear up a lot of confusion, below is an image of EXACTLY the document that Obama needs to produce.
This is the birth certificate of Susan Nordyke, one of a set of twins who were born at the Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu on August 5, 1961. Obama CLAIMS to have been born on August 6th. Therefore, this certificate form is EXACTLY THE SAME as what would have been generated for Obama.
This form gives the name, age, address, race and description of the occupation of the father. It does NOT give the religion. It gives the name, age, address, race, occupation outside of the home and last date worked of the mother.
Interestingly, IT DOES NOT LIST THE RACE OF THE CHILD. Look for yourself. There is no field at the top for race of the baby.
So, given this, there are several things we can logically conclude:
1. The word "muslim" does not appear on Obama's BC assuming he was in fact born in Honolulu in August of 1961, because these certificates make no mention of religion at all. So that can't be the big secret.
2. Obama himself cannot be listed as either "caucasian" or "arab" because there is no field on the certificate for the race of the child. So that can't be the big secret, either, assuming Obama even has a Hawaii BC.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Can’t say you’re wrong.
How do we know the date of Obama’s birth?
What is the documentation?
Who witnessed it?
What are their names?
I agree!!!!
The date is the sticking point. Being born at an earlier or a later date would bring everything together!
Does anyone remember during the 2008 election, Obamas official website listed a different birth date. I think it said a year younger.
Now I have gone over and over again in my head and there is no way he was born in 1961. If he was born earlier, like a year, then it makes sense how she went to Washington State.
Remember, there is no proof that the paper announcements have not been tampered with. Those could be photo shopped as well. And there has always been some confusion over dates when he was in Indonesia and Hawaii.
What do yall think?
The plot thickens. Do you suppose the Nordyke twins were born in a private physician’s office? Here is some info I found about Robert A. Nordyke: Robert A Nordyke in Honolulu, HI is a private company categorized under Physicians’ Office, Including Specialists. Current estimates show this company has an annual revenue of 280,000 and employs a staff of approximately 5.
If that is true, then they would have reported the birth announcement by going in to the local Department of Health to file the birth information. The filing of that information may have been taken a little time.
I noticed other announcements, and they are also days earlier than the publishing date. Since these newspapers were both daily papers, I have only theory telling me that many births were done at home in Hawaii in the ‘50s and ‘60s. If that is true, than it shows that birth announcements were not filed in much hurry in those days. I have seen the announcements from both newspapers and each entry is in the same sequence in both. That tells me that it was the Dept. of Health that sent the information to both newspapers each day as the information was filed each day.
Considering all of the hoops we probably had to go through to get where we are, I will never understand why he got a pass.
(they talked to my teachers and classmates before I was allowed, and this bastard gets nothing)
Obama is a liar and a fraud. Everything about him a a lie.
Oh am I bad! The Nordyke twins were born in Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital. My theory about a home birth for the Nordyke twins is wrong. I can’t believe I didn’t look closer at the birth certificate for this thread. I wonder if Robert Nordyke, listed as a doctor, did the delivery?
Yes, but they are very, very close, in the same batch. Why is it necessary that the numbers be in exact order? info in the pre-computer age likely came into the Health Department by mail.
To me, this is an authentication of Obama's BC, if somewhat weak.
I saw both newpaper’s birth announcements. They are line by line identicle. It tells one that they were sent out in batches by the Hawaii Dept. of Health. Also, if you look at the Nordyke twins birth announcement for this thread, you will notice that the signature of the attendant was dated 8-11-61, which was 6 days after the birth on 8-5-61. It tells me that the hospital did signatures in batches too.
Notice that on the document there are check boxes for the type of birthing attendant that facilitated the delivery. The attendant, which appears to be C.O. McInister has the box, “M ER” checked. Notice there is box for “Midwife.” That tells me that a midwife could perform a home delivery and have the mother and child taken to the hospital where the birth statistics would be filed while she recuperated.
Home births where the wife does not enter the hospital would have a different route for the birth statistics. Anyone could file the report at the Dept. of Health and it would generate a birth document and announcements to the local newspapers. Births in another country would be filed in the same way as a home delivery.
Someday, some journalist will break from the pack and do just that The story will be broken.
(S)He will uncover the truth about our imposter president.
In so doing, (s)he will receive countless journalism awards, fame, money and honors. The name will live forever in journalistic history, eclipsing Woodward and Bernstein.
That Journalist is out there. It's only a matter of time ...
If I remember correctly, there was a time that his own facebook page showed his age as older than the 1961 date would indicate. Does anyone else remember this?
Pretty much, yes. It takes a sworn affidavit and preferably by witnesses as well.
Hawaii does not require the birth to have been in Hawaii in order to record a Hawaiian birth. It requires the "registrant" (usually a parent) to assert residency in Hawaii.
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcements.html
FINAL REPORT: Obama's Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate "Natural Born" Status
By Penbrook Johannson - Editor of the Daily Pen
More than 1200 birth announcements between 1960 and 1965 were shown to contain Hawaiian addresses for registrants of births outside of the state of Hawaii, including more than three hundred in which the child was born outside of the United States.
The statutory time frame for making the Hawaiian registration is a year. Kid born, have to file for the state registration of birth within one year.
That makes more sense to me, now that I think of it - grandparents not likely to figure out "the law" in a matter of days, but given a year to ponder, etc., may have filed for Hawaiian registration just before the one year clock ran out.
I've read that the sequence of names is such that births from each hospital are grouped (separate grouping for each hospital), registration other than hospital birth are grouped, etc., and that Obama's name does not appear in a group associated with hospital birth. The DoH report doesn't directly provide that information, it seems it's just the way the "report generator" (the scheme used by DoH to create the printed report it sent to the publisher) operated. The listings are not alphabetic or date-ordered from top to bottom.
Just word games they play so they can say we never said it was official.
But what do I know about the least transparent P in history.
I totally agree. Integrity still resides in some of their backbones. The concerns are reaching ciritical mass so it will begin to be more plausible to release the story. I would bet it has been written already.
Yes. I believe it would have made his birth before HI was a state.....
I think we might be playing with semantics with that question. I had to get my certified birth certificate when I got my passport to go on my honeymoon twenty five years ago. It had the same information as this, and was noted as an “Official Certificate of Live Birth.” It had the signatures, and what-not and a raised seal.
The “short form” would have cost me $10 less, but was not good for passports. The “short form” is what Obama showed.
Thanks for the clarification, windflier.
This line of questioning proves the falsehoods in this whole nativity story. Remember Obama has insisted he was born in the hospital. There would be no embarassment to admit he was born at home, but that is not what he stated.
These folks sure did a lot of flying about the world. Where did the money come from. These certainly weren’t cheap fares.
I’m also amazed at how a young girl, with a newborn, picks herself up and supposedly moves thousands of miles away from her family.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.