Posted on 04/20/2011 4:23:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
State Farm, Gladiatorstocks.com, ARALifestyle.com, Chipotle Mexican Grill and The Ad Council had multiple advertisements on the page. I saved it as a Safari Web Archive and PDF.
What in the hell is the AD COUNCIL anyway? Every time I hear it, which it seems is all the time in the ‘brought to you by....’ segments of whatever, I get chilled. It’s seems so ‘Hal’ like.
Dodge is Chrysler - is the government - is Obama.
Obama doesn’t care about a disadvantaged cracker baby. The fact that he’s Sarah’s child, makes him care even less.
It’s just the kind of man (and I use that term loosely) he is.
Celebrity Cruise had an ad on the page when I checked. I sent them the link.
lol
Here’s the list of Wonkette’s advertisers:
Hyatt
* HP
* Celebrity X Cruises
* Fed Ex
* Reliant Energy
* Jack in the Box (say it isn’t so, Jack)
* AT&T
* Constant Contact
* Starkist Charlie
* Betty Crocker
* Gymboree
* Dunkin Donuts
* QVC
* Coca Cola
* Ann Taylor
* JJill
* Adobe
* Toyota
* Coldwell Banker
* Dodge
* Ford
* Avis
* Choice Hotels
* Dish Network
* LifeLock
* FinishLine
[via Jersey-Texan blog http://bit.ly/fu6Fg8 ]
btw - First time customer tonight at Papa John’s Pizza. Drove 11 miles out of my way. Delicious. And I told the manager why I was there.
I normally don’t go to Papa John’s...but I’ve seen the error of my ways, and will be eating there a lot more often! Thanks PJ for being real Americans!
For these guys, it’s OK to demean and make fun of a disabled child, but they want to add a course against bullying to the school curriculum.
Dang! To think of all the ammo I’ve got just sitting there in limbo...
Is Starkist owned by Pelosi?
They don't, not directly.
Web banner ads like that are generally a "pool" resource. The advertisers buy space/impressions, likely tied to site traffic, and various sites subscribe to the pool to show the ads. Most such systems allow the advertiser to restrict sites from playing their ads, and sites can restrict what kind of ad gets shown. But unless/until a particular site gets to be a problem, there's little incentive to limit the ad's distribution, as long as your getting the views you want.
But once a site does something that reflects badly on the advertisers, they do have a reason to restrict their ads. The problem is, unless every advertiser in the pool (or close to it) blocks Wonkette, it's really not going to hurt their revenue at all.
But the nasty lefty b**** had no problem taking their money before...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.