Posted on 04/13/2011 9:04:54 PM PDT by patriotgal1787
. . . . .
During an email conversation with one of my radio show listeners -- retired airline pilot JetDriver2 -- the topic of the DC-10 aircraft came up then quickly shifted over to TWA 800 and its mysterious plunge from the sky over Long Island. The conversation went from there. With his permission I have reprinted it here.
***
TWA was acquired by American two months after my retirement in Nov 2000. We never recovered from the July 1996 shoot-down of TWA 800 described by Jack Cashill in his book “First Strike”. This was a massive cover-up (for which I have personal evidence) ordered by Bill Clinton, who also ordered the assassination of Ron Brown described in another Cashill book “Ron Brown’s Body” which I recently read.
Yes TWA 800 was absolutely shot down. The FAA knows it and the FBI knows it. There was explosive residue on the seat cushions and a hole in the reconstructed fuselage. Many pieces of the wreckage were confiscated by the FBI and never seen again, including pieces identified by TWA volunteers working in the hangar at Calverton as showing missile damage.
There is no way that jet fuel fumes in an empty center fuel tank could have blown up that plane. Jet fuel is not volatile and is very difficult to ignite, nor was there enough energy in the residual fuel in the center tank to produce an explosion of that magnitude. There is testimony on this point by scientists.
There is an audiotape of an ANG helicopter pilot who was a former Navy Search and Rescue pilot in Vietnam, and who is also an attorney on Long Island. He was shooting a practice approach in the direction of the TWA 800 explosion. He testified that he saw the missile trail and he saw the explosion – it was an ordnance explosion, not a fuel explosion. This guy is familiar with anti-aircraft missiles and with military ordnance. Read the entire piece at The Radio Patriot.
I agree 100%.....
To launch a missile from a US Navy ship requires the EXPLICIT compliance both before and after the fact of literally hundreds of people. HUNDREDS - none of whom have come forward, not one - no one, nada, zip, zero.
The government (apparently) can keep that secret, but they can't keep some fraternity hazing pictures secret from Abu Grahib, or a bank monitoring program in Switzerland, or the communications between ambassadors and Secretaries of State.
The stupidity and gullibility of some of our citizens is remarkable, even breathtaking.
I'm sure all the people who witnessed this directly or MUSt have known about the missing ordinance either on the ship, on the bridge, in the weapon's stores, in the ordinance supply ships, or in the logistics and procurement offices must all be buried next to the space aliens from Roswell, NM.
I have always had questions about this. In how many airliner “accidents” can anyone recall that the FBI was in charge? I don’t remember any.
If after the investigation got going and it was determined there was no foul play then why did the FBI continue to run the investigation right to the end? Why not just turn it back over to the people at the NTSB?
I used to have a few more questions but as time has gone buy I don’t remember them anymore.
Evening Old Deck Hand,
thought you might like to watch this:
http://raylahr.entryhost.com/Videos/web/MajorFredMeyer.html
SOMEBODY shot down TWA 800. Only a sheep would believe the “center fuel tank explosion” lie.
I remember this, as well and have the same reaction you do:
“I used to have a few more questions but as time has gone buy I don’t remember them anymore.”
I guess this is exactly what the government wants-—concerned citizens who question an American tragedy to be kept “on hold” for so damned many years, that they “forget” the incident and the questions that seared their brains at the time.
That tactic isn’t going to work anymore, with the new media.
“Ordinary” people keep “records” of everything, now. (thank God!!!)
And why did the FBI threaten outside investigators?
I knew a man who was a Boeing crash inspector - worked for Boeing. I asked him about TWA800 about 10 years ago.
He said, “It was a missile.”
Bttt.
My ex-wife, who is the least scientifically oriented or aviation oriented soul on Earth said at the time, “Who the hell do they think they’re fooling?”
Wow, that's convincing. A guy who was in a helicopter thought it looked like a missile explosion. /s
As someone who has practiced law for 27-years, I can tell you without equivocation that the most unreliable evidence you can EVER introduce into a court of law, is someone's eyewitness testimony. This isn't even that.
Lex parsimoniae has stood the test of time for a reason.
A government "coverup" involving hundreds of people over (almost) 20-years is hardly the simplest explanation.
Give up. Trying to convince these conspiracy wackos is like trying to teach a pig to dance:
1: You can’t win
2: It’s just a waste of time
3: It only frustrates the pig
I know who really did it. It was Colonel, I mean Admiral Mustard with the lead pipe in the Conservatory.
He said it was a missile. Hell, that convinces me! Where or where did all the rest of us ever miss all that convincing evidence!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, it was space aliens. They were here to meet Tom Cruise and John Travolta in a NY city gay bathhouse, or something. They took TWA 800 as a hostile threat, and acted accordingly.
It was a missile. The American people are so dense that they never see the truth. Thank God 9/11 was live on dozens of channels, or else the MSM would have called all the targets "structural failure caused by poor Republican design decades earlier."
Yeah, those gas tanks will just go up in a ball of fire at anytime.Funny I never heard of another one doing that, ever.Boeing doesnt make junk.Airbust on the other hand...I dont buy that our military had anything to do with it but I do buy that the bird was brought down by a missle.
What's your interest in the cover up?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.