Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Brown Deer; LucyT; Fred Nerks
That is pretty childish.

How so? A football team lives in dorms, which are normally located on campus, but you say the campus was completely shut down.

You've also made allegations that published newspaper articles from 1961, which discuss certain classes being in session several weeks before what you say as the start date, as false. Why are you so emphatic about that?

What we are discussing is a fairly narrow factual question. Where the football team lives during summer practice in August, or for that matter where other students might have been living is irrelevant.

If you knew what the facts were, you wouldn't have said that. In 1961, during summer practice, the football team lived in the crewhouse which together with the practice facilities is several miles from the campus. I know that because I was there.

As far as I know, the only newspaper article I referred to specifically is Corsi's WND article having Stanley Ann in Seattle registering for and attending classes on Augus 19--but, if there are others on the same allegation, yes, they are all wet also.

If you were going to pick one specific period of the year in which it would not have been possible for Stanley Ann to be registering for and attending classes at the University of Washington in 1961, it would be the period starting on August 19 and ending on Labor Day.

I know that because I was there also.

And, at the time Corsi furnished the original transcript with the dates on it, I knew exactly how the error had occurred and why the error had happened. I knew that because I have seen many of the old style transcript ledgers at the University of Washington.

So when I see another letter from the University confirming the facts as I originally set them out (I think almost) two years ago, I don't need to authenticate it because I already knew what had happened and the letter spells it out exactly as I described.

All that said, it really doesn't make a lot of difference--we can still see from the record that someone claiming to be Stanley Ann was at the U registering for Night School in the normal course of activity on September 19 and we can further tell from the fact that she took the finals during regularly scheduled finals week and got a decent grade, that she was in Night School at Washington in that period.

1,062 posted on 04/24/2011 9:56:46 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies ]


To: David; LucyT; Fred Nerks
As far as I know, the only newspaper article I referred to specifically is Corsi's WND article having Stanley Ann in Seattle registering for and attending classes on Augus 19--but, if there are others on the same allegation, yes, they are all wet also.

Do you only read what you want to see?

For example, in the Lynnwood Enterprise, Lynnwood, Washington, Wednesday, September 06, 1961 on page 6: "He is attending a two-week seesion of intensive graduate study sponsored by the American Savings & Loan Institue at the University of Washington from Sept. 3-16."

I don't need to authenticate it because I already knew what had happened and the letter spells it out exactly as I described.

Just because some anonymous person like you makes claims, the world should take that as fact?

we can still see from the record that someone claiming to be Stanley Ann was at the U registering for Night School in the normal course of activity on September 19

There is nothing on that record that says any such thing!

On that record is a date of "06/01/60" after "Mercer High School". We also see that she barely passed only two classes after attending college for a year in Hawaii. She was also paying out of state tuition. She was still a freshman after two years of college. We can also calculate her true GPA as being only 2.65.
1,066 posted on 04/24/2011 10:53:56 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1062 | View Replies ]

To: David; Brown Deer
...--we can still see from the record that someone claiming to be Stanley Ann was at the U registering for and attending classes...

I would feel a whole lot more sure about that, if the information from the U of WA had come first...and the discovery of the address for ANNA OBAMA followed, instead of the other way around. There were a number of class of 1960 MIHS graduates who attended the U of WA IN 1961, AND IF ANYONE OF THEM had come forward and said; "I was at/saw her at the University of Washington" AND THEN Charlette Le Fevre found the address as a RESULT, that would sit a whole lot better.

Meanwhile, someone claiming to be Stanley Ann Dunham and Charlette Le Fevre's identification of ANNA OBAMA as Stanley Ann Dunham is all we have.

1,077 posted on 04/24/2011 12:32:09 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1062 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson