Posted on 04/08/2011 2:03:19 AM PDT by Scanian
And just think…. It was only a few short hours ago that far left Wisconsin candidate JoAnne Kloppenburg declared victory in the state’s Supreme Court race. Now this.
Watch the first 36 seconds of her victory speech if you want a good laugh.
[Video]
From the video:
Question: "How do you feel comfortable declaring victory when the margin is so thin? Justice Prosser’s supporters seem to think that they may be able to pull out a victory in a recount process."
Kloppenburg: "You know, we ran a campaign that was focused on being positive and respectful and winning and we did win and we’re confident that the margin will hold… Because we’ve enjoyed a broad and deep state-wide support and we’re gratified that the numbers showed that."
That’s not all.
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
a “Rush to Judgement” strikes again.
I have my doubts as to just how many of those were legitimate Wisconsin voters. The next thing Scott Walker has to do is clean up the “walk in out of the blue and vote” process in Wisconsin that was clearly created just for fraud - and he has to do this BEFORE the 2012 elections. “The One’ is putting out big bucks to his union cronies to steal the 2012 election. His ego will never allow him to go down in history as a one-term President, (Jimmy Carter, anyone?). Let what almost happened with the election of Klipper-Klopper be the last time election fraud was this easy.
You beat me by 20 seconds!
The Dems are lawyering up, and have retained the same attorney who represented Democratic challenger Al Franken in his eight-month epic recount battle with incumbent Republican Norm Coleman
It ain't over until it's over. And when Dems lose, they NEVER consider it over.
I hope Judge Prosser has some really good body guards. Prayers for the his safety.
This is a telling statement about her. With the 204 vote margin she had, she actually thinks this shows "broad and deep sate-wide support" for her. Talk about delusional !
I also wondered if her early victory speech indicated the type of judge she would be.....declaring a decision before hearing all the facts...
WI weak laws are Unreal. You only have to prove residency for 10 days ! But that is even ignored in Madison where poll workers spotted Wacko Leftist parents letting their under 18 teenagers vote.
“I can’t help but wonder if this was not a Republican strategem: The Democrat’s tactic is to wait until the counts are in, then see how many votes they need to manufacture.
But the Repubs in that county waited until the Dems totals were announced, then they came up with the correcting 7,500 votes.
If so, a brilliant move by the Repubs! “
I would love to believe that, but I really don’t think the Repubs are that clever. I heard the press conference and I really think that county chair lady made an honest mistake and failed to hit the “F5” button on the City of Brookfield totals. She seemed very sincere and apologetic. And, the ranking Democrat backed up everything she said. But who knows, maybe that’s all part of the act too.
I think this was one of those judge retention votes which usually the judge wins by more than 60% of the vote, even if he/she is very unpopular. I could be wrong. But Prosser is already on the bench. So he doesn’t have to be sworn in again. The vote has to be certified though which would happen this month.
First, the recount will not be free. Kloppenburg’s team will have to pay for it. Second, Prosser already had a team in place to start the recount. Third, Kloppenburg and her cronies know that they had committed voter fraud ie. ballot shredding, etc and will be exposed big time if they start a recount.
Friday laugh ping!
I am working on my own post for this subject.
Yes, some will resort to any means to change this result.
Don’t overdo the laughter.
Kloppo has brought in Franken’s legal team to try to overturn the results.
That is a disgrace. WI has a conservative Republican governor, a Republican majority in both the house and senate, a conservative majority sitting on the SC. This needs to be fixed ASAP. That and several other things while WI still has the ability to do it.
Thanks for providing the link to the video.
Watching it makes me shudder. I used to be confident that aliens from another planet had not succeeded in imitating humans and infiltrating our society, but now I’m not so sure.
>Good thing for the rats that she did not have her joint appearance with Obama yet...
hahaha -yes. Seriously, you have touched on a point of interest to watch.
I wonder how many Dems will be inviting Obama Hussein to stand with them in their respective re-election campaigns.
It will be an indicator of sorts for O’s real popularity, not just what the MSM Ministry of Propaganda cranks out..
Similar thoughts had crossed my mind.
Well, now many of those 750,000 are U of WI college kids that voted 2 or more times (once by absentee at home and once from campus)? How many are votes created by union thugs canvassing the previous year's obituaries and voting in the names of the recently deceased? I would bet that 1/4 of those 750,000 are fraudulent votes. If not for fraud, no democrat and precious few RINOs would be able to win an election.
Psht. She only lost big if you count republican votes.
I think you bring up a great point that people are sometimes missing here as it relates to the unions.
If this 7,000 vote margin holds up, this would be a massive victory for the Tea Party.
You had at least 500,000 union family members coming out to vote for their cushy union jobs. As you say, add in another 250,000 liberal activists and there is your tally for her. Our problem in Wisconsin isn’t that we’ve got too many liberals, but that we’ve got too many State and local employees on the dole for a State our size.
Those union peolple have never been told “no” until this Spring. They assume that the majority of the State backs them. They don’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.