Posted on 04/07/2011 12:46:23 PM PDT by patlin
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE II
Sec 5 No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Nearly a year ago now, Mark R. Levin with all his constitutional expertise stated the dual citizenship is not 14th Amendment citizenship. Rather it is citizenship by statute. If so, the how cone he is ignoring Article II qualifications and promoting Bobby Jindal for president, knowing that Jindal was born a citizen of India? Would that not make Jindal a citizen by statute, not by nature? Also, he recently has been promoting Marco Rubio. I like Marco, but do we know for a fact that his parents were naturalized citizens at the time of Marco's birth?
Caller: Yes, how does dual citizenship work? How can person have dual alliances for example lets say we got into a war with say IsraelYello! Yello! Could someone get Mark on the phone & ask him to explain this to us please?Mark: hahahahaha
Caller: You know what I am saying
Mark: yeah, yeah, the jews, we gotta watch out for them
Caller: No, no, it could be that .
Mark: Let me explain something to you. In terms of dual citizenship, that is done statutorily, you understand? In other words, Congress determines, us, the nature of dual citizenship, what qualifies for dual citizenship and so forth; which is why it is so absurd to argue that 14th Amendment by itself confers citizenship on illegal aliens
Caller: Well, thats a good point, thats a very good point. I understand
Mark: Well, its the truth, its not even, yeah
Caller: No, no, I understand ya, Im not arguing with ya, I listen to you to learn
Mark: Alright my friend, thank you, youre a good man, thank you Im no fan of dual citizenship either, Ill be perfectly honest with you
“Knock yourself out. “
From the conversation so far, I think it might be the equivalence of casting pearls before swine. I’m beginning to think that talking to you is like teaching a pig to dance. I’m wasting a lot of time, and I’m annoying the pig.
I might do it later for amusement. Right now I have to go Responsibilitys call.
Wrong. The law needs to be clarified. There doesn't need to be any new law as it already exists in Article II of the law of the land.
gotcha
There is nothing really that you need be annoyed over.
As would Vattel. Or haven't you read the book?
Read the Federalist papers. This issue is discussed in there as well. I would excerpt them for you, but Im suspecting it would be a waste of my time. Not yours, of course. You might actually get some knowledge on you.
Knowledge? Not from your posts it appears.
I think you are a Liberal partisan attempting to misdirect. You might even be part of a paid team. You obviously know too much about the information being discussed to get it so completely wrong by accident.
No one is that stupid. Therefore you are an agent of the enemy. That’s what I think.
If everyone on this forum who disagrees with you is a liberal partisan attempting to misdirect then the liberals outnumber the conservatives by a large margin.
No one is that stupid.
Oh I don't know about that.
I am not playing this game with you anymore. You are obviously intelligent enough to comprehend what has been put in front of you. The fact that you WILL NOT means that you are not amendable to facts or reason.
I happen to know that there are Liberal partisans all over this issue on lots of different blogs, and I think You are one of those. You are just a source of noise trying to prevent others from hearing the truth.
Obama is NOT eligible under Article II because he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen. Indeed, at this point we don’t even know if he’s an American citizen of any sort. He is a lying con man that has done great damage to the nation, and hopefully those people who have enabled and protected him will eventually feel the wrath and vengeance of the American people whom they have betrayed.
Of course you don’t know about that. The first rule of fooldom is to be unaware of the condition.
I'll defer to your expertise in the rules of fooldom.
“I’ll defer to your expertise in the rules of fooldom.”
Your pathetic counter-riposte invokes the FALLACY OF AUTHORITY! Ha ha ha ha...
Here. Get an education then come back when you are better prepared. :)
http://www.constitution.org/col/logical_fallacies.htm
Don’t they teach this stuff in LIEberal land?
Actually I shouldn’t even show you that. It might give you some ideas for fallacies you haven’t tried yet. Ah well, at least I can amuse myself watching you flop about. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.