Posted on 04/02/2011 8:54:17 AM PDT by patriotgal1787
. . . . .
Dear readers,
If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times or more --- how can a guy who does as much reporting on what's going on in the World of Soros miss this? How can a guy who claims to be able to piece disparate pieces together to see the big picture miss this? How can a guy who tells his viewers and listeners to "Question with Boldness" and seek the truth because "The Truth Has No Agenda" deliberately turn his back on what is so glaringly obvious to millions of us? If he can uncover and report day after day on the evil being perpetrated on America by some of the most powerful people in the world, why won't he report on this?
Glenn Beck is anything but stupid. The incredibly talented Beck is nobody's fool. He knows better than most about what is going on behind the curtain, under the surface, in the back rooms. So what gives?
Has he been told to keep his mouth shut? Has he been told his children's lives are in danger if he shines a spotlight on Obama's eligibility? Has he been told he can go anywhere but "there"? Is the truth something so horrible he refrains from telling us because... because... what?
And if Beck's been threatened, what makes this any different from all the other threats he's received that requires him to have 24-hour security protection? What's he been told? Who told him? What does Beck know that we don't?
For a guy who claims to have America's best interests at heart and has dedicated his career to promoting and educating America about the values and history of our Founders and the founding documents, why does he actively disparage those who do "question with boldness" this socialist mystery man in our White House? Who has gotten to Beck?
On this very serious issue, Beck is playing the fool -- the rodeo clown. And never more so than when he makes his weekly appearances as the galoomphy buffoon playing off Bill O'Bloviator's superciliousness. (Lord, that man is an overrated ignoramus.)
When Beck starts with this foolishness, I turn him off. His mockery of those who question with boldness about something he obviously does not want to go near, insults us all. I am personally disappointed in him. And sadly, reluctantly, question his credibility. Every time he opens his mouth to disparage "birthers", he damages himself in the eyes of millions. I shake my head in wonderment. How can he be so stupid? If he honestly doesn't agree that it is a major issue, just shut up about it already. Why insult most of your audience? Or is he trying to signal us that this is such a dangerous area that he is dissuading us from pursuing it? It is baffling.
Note in the video below that Beck and O'Bloviator never address the essential issue Trump has brought forward about Obama's eligibility. Instead they dissect why Trump is making "provocative" statements, deciding it's "because he likes the attention."
O'Bloviator's so ignorant, one wouldn't expect him to think it through any deeper than "announcements were published int he newspaper. But Beck is brighter than that. He's not a stupid man. So who has gotten to him? Who has gotten to Beck???
Pay close attention to what O'Bloviator says at the very end of the segment when he responds to Beck's comment about stating the truth of what's going on: "But then you and I would be off the air."
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m8W8xc9AoE&feature=player_embedded#at=19]
. . . . .
...biggest political fraud in history of world...says notre dame law professor...
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/notre-dame-professor-charles-rice.html
As a means of comparison, imagine if Bush 43 had these same voids. Do you think for a moment the reaction of the media would be the same?
Nice of you to finally admit that there are no verifiable facts to support the Obama nativity tale.
good on history but the guy is mostly a showman and a clown and he is off balance. His 15 minutes of fame has lasted way too long.
Consider this, two of our “leaders” of the conservative movement are otherwise multiple failures... Beck and alcoholic and combative radio personality fired from numerous jobs in the past and remade somehow (you gotta give him marks for this) and Hannity a dishwasher, laborer, carpenter come political pundit / personality. Neither educated or with any other redeeming credentials. O’Reilly, that’s another story but not much better.
“Beck said on oreilly that Trump produced a “worse” birth certificate than Obama. Check out the short form birth certificates of Trump and Obama and tell me which one is “worse”. Beck is a dunce and I used to be a regular watcher of his show.”
I think Beck missed the point on this one. I think Donald deliberately released his version of a “COLB” first and then came out with the long form the next day. He said on O’Reilly that he released the BC the hospital gave his parents and “that wasn’t good enough” so he released the long form. He is boxing Obama in. He knows at some point the Whitehouse will make a statement that Obama has already posted his COLB online and then Trump can say its not good enough.
If I've said it once, I've said it a hundred times or more --- how can a guy who does as much reporting on what's going on in the World of Soros miss this? How can a guy who claims to be able to piece disparate pieces together to see the big picture miss this? How can a guy who tells his viewers and listeners to "Question with Boldness" and seek the truth because "The Truth Has No Agenda" deliberately turn his back on what is so glaringly obvious to millions of us?
Dear Writer or Poster,
What is "this" that is "so glaringly obvious to millions of us"? Even if what's here is only an excerpt or snippet, you really do have to explain what your "this" is.
With regard to Beck, he's sort of an introvert in an extrovert's medium. He tends to turn inward, into himself, and brood. It's not that he's incapable of looking outward, to his audience, and forming what he thinks into mass entertainment. It's just that he can't keep that up day after day, so he returns to his own private preoccupations, rather than what will attract and hold an audience.
But what's true of him is also true of other people. The mass audience isn't going to share the preoccupations of political activists and enthusiasts. Things that a few people talk about with passion may sound strange or uninteresting to a mass public.
If you keep on about it, maybe Beck will notice, if he's still on the air by then, and feature your issue on his show, but you can't expect that he's going to pick up your own favorite topic immediately. A certain amount of steam has to build up before your issue attracts notice.
For those of us who discuss topics anonymously on the Internet there's no price to being wrong or irrelevant or obsessive. It's different for opiners or opinionators who are in the public eye.
If the last election proved anything it is that absolutely anybody can become president. Even a back bench er from the IL Senate with no experience and no verifiable eligibility of any kind. It is impossible to verify his age.
At this point if these people are so powerful and corrupted they will forge what's need if needed...
Focus everything on the BC and all will die on that hill before taking out Obomber on this one issue
People wake up to you need to have several independent fronts of attack
Let Trump be the designated starking horse on the BC front... and let others take on other fronts
Think you’re right.
Beck’s letting others pursue this BC issue...and I guarantee you he has been watching the ‘results’ very, very closely. Those who bring it up have been so damned marginalized, ridiculed, etc., that I believe Beck has chosen other battles to fight that he feels are more important.
However, I’m compelled to add that if the above theory is correct, then he should simply say nothing about it vs. downplaying it or, worse, openly adding to the ridicule heaped upon those who DO feel it is an important issue.
Maybe because when obozo is proven to be unable and unfit to be the president, and forced to leave office, we will see a race war that makes the mid east look tame.
I am disappointed in ALL of our conservative media talking bobbleheads not just Beck. I have already cut back on my listening and viewing them or reading their colums.
Having seen the show you refer to last night I was blown away by Beck and O’really’s attitude. I have to assume that no one has gotten to them they are just stupid.
Beck seems to be following O’rally’s lead on this and O’rally has lied to his viewers, having told them he had seen the BC then when Thrump was on O based his position on the newspaper ads. O had to do this because its out that there is no BC.
I will not vote for any person for office that doesn’t address this issue, includes Palin, Bachman or whoever,
IMHO every conservative media talking bobblehead that doesn’t address this issue is nothing more than a prostitute for the MSM.
There's a significant thread of evidence that points in that direction, even some pretty good anecdotal evidence of who the mother might have been, and I don't mean his pornographer-wild-child "mother," Stanley.
Of, yeah, big shame, right? If that were to eventually come out, Barry O would be certain to hang his head in feigned shame and everything else about his Red Diaper origins, things far are more complex and damning, would immediately be attached to the "Birther" label.
Under the right set of circumstances, (say weeks before the last or next election?) the sympathy backlash might, unfortunately, absolutely shut down every other line of investigation.
It is possible, just possible, that the Birth Certificate issue is a red herring, a ringer, deliberately hidden along with all the other things, like his transcripts and admissions forms, Social Security numbers, etc., in order to discredit and engineer shame upon all those who have a problem with bastards, in general.
You have to admit this is a possibility, don't you? And Trump? Since when has this guy become a paragon of virtue? I respect the guy, too, but he's a hardball playing amoral publicity hound who's been bankrupted more than once. He could be a Pied Piper, and it's just about certain he's dancing to a drummer the rest of us cannot hear. It wouldn't be the first time.
Speaking of Ross Perot...
I remember one comic strip had a guy writing a check, putting it in an
envelope, dropping it in the mail, and finally stopping and
thinking, "Did I just mail $10 to a billionaire?"
That is the perfect question and why didn't he ask me? The other myth is that he couldn't have sex before marriage with the little woman. What a blasphemous joke.
The Mormonism talking points are embedded in his crybaby personage. A lightweight idiot that fell for it without any serious study.
Stalking horse strategy - Trump and Cain are true patriots, raising challenges and important issues that are sure to incur attacks from the MSM and the Left, protectors of Zippy. They are paving the way for the more mainstream GOP candidates. That being said, either Trump or Cain would be a great asset to the GOP ticket.
And you ‘know’ this - how? it is impossible to prove a negative.
Considering we have never been down that road, we really don't know what the result would be, however, at least Constitutionally, any bills he signed could stand as 'non-signed'. According to Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution, a bill that is not signed by the President after 10 days automatically becomes law without the President's signature.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.