Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
...the difference between royalty schemes (everybody agrees) and taxes (confiscation).

When the state government and its people own the resource there is little difference between a tax and a royalty on the resource owned.

The Palin scheme is the Obama scheme.

The Palin scheme in not the Obama scheme unless of course if the federal government owns the resource.

89 posted on 03/27/2011 11:57:01 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

Here is another article about the issue.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2014601450_alaska27.html


92 posted on 03/27/2011 11:59:26 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign
When the state government and its people own the resource there is little difference between a tax and a royalty on the resource owned.

_____________________________________

Utter nonsense.

Royalties are agreed upon compensation for the exploitation of something of value.

When did you agree to be taxed? When did you ever have the option?

Typical spin.

95 posted on 03/27/2011 12:02:31 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson