Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
Is EEE actually suggesting that she would confiscate and then re-distribute corporate revenues?

How is it confiscation if an agreement is signed by all parties involved?

If drilling off the coast of CA means that residents should get a cut, then yes, I'm all for it. Call it what you want but if the oil companies agree to it, it's not confiscation.

67 posted on 03/27/2011 11:06:53 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Luke ScottWalker - The Force Is With You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
How is it confiscation if an agreement is signed by all parties involved?

_________________________________

It's hard to discuss this with somebody who doesn't seem to know the difference between royalty schemes (everybody agrees) and taxes (confiscation).

Did you sign off on the government's' imposition of IRS confiscation of a % your earnings? I sure didn't.

And neither did the oil companies when Palin levied her extra tax on top of the existing taxes and royalties.

The Palin scheme is the Obama scheme. It stinks like those famous down-strean floating fish.

86 posted on 03/27/2011 11:49:34 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson