I listened to what she said, and it is close to what I said. She did leave enough lawyerly weasel words in there for a “plausible deniability”of malicious intent toward Israel,
I am sure she will say she was “misunderstood” if called to task for these inexcusable remarks.
I enjoy pundits, especially liberal lawyers and politicians, that have to obfuscate what they mean. When I first saw this on Pamela Gellar's site, it was painful to watch and felt like it was three times longer than it actually was.
Just say what you mean Susan! You are an anti-Semite and want to destroy Israel. Why all the verbal gymnastics? And I really don't care for the arrogance. Who the heck is she to dictate what should be done to a sovereign nation? What qualifies her to make any national or foreign policy decisions in the first place? I don't recall her name on any ballot. Have we really turned over our foreign policy to amateur hacks like this troll? - Don't answer, I know we have.