Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Faces Uphill Battle in Ohio
Pundit Press ^ | 3/24/2011 | Thomas Ferdousi

Posted on 03/24/2011 8:24:30 AM PDT by therightliveswithus

According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Obama is not faring to greatly. His ratings are not terrible, but he faces the wrath of an electorate suffering heavily from the faltering economy and that oppose ObamaCare.

When asked a variety of questions, voters were almost evenly split on Obama and his Administration.

Does Obama deserve re-election?

Yes: 45% No: 46% Dk/unsure: 9%

Obama Approval Rating

Approve: 47% Disapprove: 48% Dk/unsure: 5%

(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; obama; ohio; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: brownsfan

The GOP doesn’t have to run them.


21 posted on 03/24/2011 10:43:28 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

This is Quinnepac and I can tell you that unless they polled in a college town the results shoud be much worse than this.I seldom hear Obama’s name not preceeded by some expletive!


22 posted on 03/24/2011 10:46:15 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioman

So did I. I do, however, skim their headlines online, on my way to the obits.
When I saw the headline, I had to see who took the poll. No surprize to find it was Quinnipiac, making it leftist propaganda, not news.


23 posted on 03/24/2011 10:48:24 AM PDT by Wiser now (Happiness is not an absence of problems, but the ability to deal with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

It is a registered voter poll.


24 posted on 03/24/2011 10:52:48 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

“The GOP doesn’t have to run them.”

Excellent point. Thanks, that makes me feel a little better.


25 posted on 03/24/2011 11:02:57 AM PDT by brownsfan (D - swift death of the republic, R - lingering death for the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

So why did the Democrats pick Charlotte for the national convention in ‘12? I think Cleveland would had been the better pick.


26 posted on 03/26/2011 5:47:39 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

They needed a state with a Democratic governor. You never want to hold a convention in a State that has a governor from the opposite political party for many reasons — one of which is security. For example, every Governor controls the National Guard — if there are problems, a Governor of your party can re-establish control, whereas a Governor of the opposite party can let matters get out of hand.

The other option for the RATS was St. Louis, but it is rumored that Claire McCaskill did NOT want the convention in Missouri (which also has a RAT governor, by the way).

Charlotte is a stupid political decision by the RATS, and it shows how truly vulnerable this Empty Suit is.


27 posted on 03/28/2011 7:39:08 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson