Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/18/2011 2:57:48 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Starman417

IF we go, we’ll just go in blue hats, right?


2 posted on 03/18/2011 3:00:40 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
Obama's Two Degrees of Separation from Farrakhan and Gaddafi
"It was no accident that terrorist President Gaddafi
of Libya referred incessantly to Obama as his son"

"Obama's ties to Libya, Gaddafi, conspiracy exposed,
Gaddafi financed Farrakhan, Nation of Islam....
the truth about why Obama’s was silent for so long
about the unrest in Libya, (especially in comparison to Egypt)
and his kid-glove treatment of Gaddafi is exposed. "


"Connecting the dots of Obama’s actions "


"..why President Obama has been mum on the subject of Libya
Obama's spiritual leader, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, has been tied to Gaddafi. "



3 posted on 03/18/2011 3:00:46 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

All the libs are backing Obammy...killing is good when it’s done by Socialists.


4 posted on 03/18/2011 3:02:25 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

As with most issues... Reagan showed the way:

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2010/12/gippers-greatest-hits-reagan-bombs.html


5 posted on 03/18/2011 3:02:41 PM PDT by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

WHat Congressional resolution was that??


6 posted on 03/18/2011 3:03:06 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

I’m confused.

The liberals are defending the Obama failure to lead by saying it was better than Bush’s “rush to war” in Iraq.

If I recall correctly there were months of debate before going to war in Iraq. How many months of debate were there before the no fly zone resolution?


7 posted on 03/18/2011 3:03:59 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Governor Sarah Palin: Obama’s ‘3 a.m. Phone Call Went Right to the Answering Machine’


10 posted on 03/18/2011 3:10:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Left unchecked, we have every reason to believe that Qadhafi would commit atrocities against his people. Many thousands could die. A humanitarian crisis would ensue.

NOT MY PROBLEM ANY MORE THAN BOSNIA.

The entire region could be destabilized, endangering many of our allies and partners.

YAWN. HEARD IT ALL BEFORE AND FRANKLY, WE HAVE NO IDEA WHO OR WHAT WE ARE GETTING AS REPLACEMENTS. IT AIN’T GONNA WORK OUT WELL FOR US OR THEM.

The calls of the Libyan people for help would go unanswered. The democratic values that we stand for would be overrun.

OUR VALUES AND DICTATES OF OUR SOCIETY ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AND BASED ON DIFFERENT HISTORICAL VIEWPOINTS.

Moreover, the words of the international community would be rendered hollow.

THEY ALREADY ARE.


11 posted on 03/18/2011 3:12:02 PM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
Yeah, deja vu...anyone recall the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998? Never saw so many bellicose Dems, including Hillary and John "I Went To Vietnam" Kerry. They sure got amnesia as soon as Bush actually took action on it...
13 posted on 03/18/2011 3:34:36 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

It was hilarious watching David Gregory try to cover for this “man”. He said since Clinton was for regime change but didn’t do it, but Bush carried through, it was okay for obama to be FOR regime change but not willing to do what has to be done to change it. And these creeps say stuff like this with a straight face.


17 posted on 03/18/2011 3:43:40 PM PDT by Terry Mross (We need a SECOND party'1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

22 posted on 03/18/2011 4:00:44 PM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

And some FReepers are just SO sure putting a hit on Gaddafi and wiping out Libya’s military are absolutely critical to our national security.... that it’s the “right thing to do.”

OK... how are we doing on the “no fly zone” over Iran? Just checking?


25 posted on 03/18/2011 6:03:24 PM PDT by ScottinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
Atrocities against his people....check

Humanitarian crisis....check

Destabilization of the region....check

Calls by the Iraqi people for help....check

Democracy....check

All liberal reasons from top to bottom. Liberalism masquerading as right-wing.

26 posted on 03/18/2011 6:29:59 PM PDT by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

27 posted on 03/18/2011 6:54:54 PM PDT by ScottinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
I doubt Gaddafi was very impressed.


28 posted on 03/18/2011 9:03:48 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson