Frankly I find the SS# question an even redder legal herring than the birth certificate. I keep asking why it is significant and if anyone truly believes that even multiple SS#s would ever be prosecuted much less held up in court if those courts have chosen to overlook the more legitimate Constitutional questions. There are some ‘birthers’ who have deep, historical knowledge I couldn’t begin to touch; others, not so much.
I merely posted about my own experience applying simultaneously for three (3) SS#’s. If called upon (not likely) I would be willing to swear to that experience and its result in a court of law. To what avail, God only knows.
I would note that my spouse and 3 children were born in the same jurisdiction from which their SS#’s were issued. All four fall within a similar, if not identical, series for ‘area number’ as the SSA terms the first 3 digits. That difference, of course, would be attributable to the intervening decades between their births.
I have dealt with clients born in that same jurisdiction that has already surpassed the numbering formerly used and whose area number is completely different from my family’s area number series. So there are new overlay numbers already in play, much like cell phones.
They know most people don't know much about the topic and won't take the time to learn about it more than superficially. Trouble is, I actually went to 5315 Gorniak Drive in Parlin, NJ, for example (one of the places Orly Taitz claimed President Obama listed as an address), and guess what...there are people named Obama who aren't the same one as the guy in the big White House.
If John Smith becomes President, Hoo-Boy! Using their methods shown here, the birther hucksters (those who are pushing the stuff they know are red herrings) would be claiming thousands of false addresses were used by the guy!
And, of course, the SSA has even said: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information.
You're right about the area numbers changing for locations. Also, the group numbers don't go in numerical sequential order; for example, 02 follows 98. The SSA posts the High Group lists every month: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/ssnvhighgroup.htm
But as I wrote above, in a few months, they are going to be freezing that list and randomizing: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/randomization.html
There might very well be something fishy, but this just makes them look like bozos.