Posted on 03/15/2011 7:39:23 AM PDT by charlene4
Thanks for all that detail, charlene4.
Jackson (township?) New Jersey? That’s a new one. I didn’t know he had a New Jersey address, but I do know that in 1995 his brother Mark Okoth Ndesandjo lived in Bayonne, NJ.
I know of two addresses for him when he was at Columbia: 142 W. 109th St. #3E, where it’s said he roomed with a “friend”, Phil Boerner, and 339 E. 94th St. #6A, in the Yorkville neighborhood of Manhattan.
As I said, that 999 SS# is a red flag. It was filler when there was no number to enter in a computer record; however, a person who had worked for a reputable company in Hawaii would HAVE a SS#, and if he were the person who was issued that 042 number in CT circa 1977, then by the time he went to Occidental, that should have been the number on his college records.
It would help a lot if Sankey and Susan Daniels (another PI mentioned by Jack Cashill in that WND story) would identify the SOURCE for these data.
It’s unfortunately true that online databases contain errors. You need only to look for yourself in those files to find errors. If those online databases are the sources for these discrepancies, then one would have to look at each case in order to determine if it was a mistake or fraud.
Yet the sheer number of “mistakes” in Obama’s records is another red flag. If it’s true that TODAY, he uses that 042 number, then somebody needs to explain definitively how he could have a SS# that was issued in 1977 from Connecticut.
If there’s a simple explanation, one would think that when Gibbs was asked by Kinsolving for an explanation, Gibbs would have given the explanation instead of redirecting the conversation to another Alinsky-like attack on “birthers”. That’s yet another RED flag. (Pun intended.)
mark for later reading
That’s an interesting article that you linked, Kleon. Thanks.
From that article, “More than 20 million Americans have multiple Social Security numbers (SSNs) associated with their name in commercial records. . . . more than 40 million SSNs are associated with multiple people. . . . 6.1 percent of Americans have at least two SSNs associated with their name. More than 100,000 Americans have five or more SSNs associated with their name. Some SSNs are very popular - More than 15 percent of SSNs are associated with two or more people. More than 140,000 SSNs are associated with five or more people. Significantly, more than 27,000 SSNs are associated with 10 or more people. While most of the discrepancy is due to data entry errors in business transactions that use SSNs, some duplication is also likely linked to fraud.”
They admit that some is LIKELY linked to fraud. What’s interesting is that the article uses the term AMERICANS when what is also LIKELY is that many of those with such discrepancies are not AMERICANS and are, in fact, ILLEGAL ALIENS who use bogus SS#s. They share numbers. They make up numbers.
So this story tells us that Obama is among the only 6.1% of the population who have more than one SS# associated with his name.
What percentage of the population, I wonder, consists of illegal aliens? 7 to 20 million, per Wikipedia, so roughly 2 to 7% of the population; 6.1% fits nicely within that range.
To put it in another way, what percentage of the population consists of those who use fraudulent SS#s for whatever reason?
More than 100,000 people have more than 5 SS#s associated with their names. 100,000 sounds like a lot of people, but not when you put it into perspective—roughly 1/3 OF 1% of the population have numerous SS#s; but of those few, our POTUS is one. He and a lot of illegal aliens, in all probability. We know he’s exceptional, of course, so this should be no surprise to us.
If you’re considering these to be data entry errors, then it wouldn’t be hard to spot a typo, such as a transposition of adjoining digits or just one digit off. But Obama’s “mistakes” don’t look at all like data entry errors.
I’m no mathemetician, but perhaps among the FR community, there’s somebody with the ability to figure probabilities. What’s the probability that in the case of ONE person with more than 5 SS#s associated with his name, that each and every incident is the result of, not deliberate fraud, but serial data entry errors?
i did run a check on myself, a few address’ showed that I never lived at , but my ex husband did. (he really severly has messed with my credit) ok I get that we were related at one time and did share credit. The craziest thing was it showed me as DECEASED! I do realize mistakes happenn, but I also think the ratio is way off when it come to the guy in the WH, oh wait, he isn’t at the WH he is going to Rio! Wish I was!
I do believe this can and should , with out a doubt be figured out and proven one way or the other.
He sure was..It's on their web site. I can't believe it.
The Dynamic changes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.