Desperate Libyan Rebels Beg Dithering West to Assassinate Muammar Gaddafi

Reaganite Republican ^ | March 14, 2011 | Reaganite Republican

[Reaganite Republican]

Way too late for a no-fly zone to do anybody any good:

"...we are disappointed with the US 
for not exercising leadership"

-Malta Times-

The Libyan opposition -back on their heels as pro-Gaddafi forces consolidate fresh gains in what was rebel-controlled territory in the east- has been reduced to pleading for a targeted strike on Gaddafi's residential compound, ala Ronald Reagan 1986..


Seems they realize that in the unlikely event of Beijing and the Kremlin actually approving a UN NFZ, it's not going to have the desired effect on the outcome now... the rebels need a lot deeper intervention than that, and they're never going to get it:

__________________________________________

Libya's revolutionary leadership is pressing western powers to assassinate Muammar Gaddafi and launch military strikes against his forces to protect rebel-held cities from the threat of bloody assault.

Mustafa Gheriani, spokesman for the revolutionary national council in its stronghold of Benghazi, said the appeal was to be made by a delegation meeting the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, in Paris on Monday, as G8 foreign ministers gathered there to consider whether to back French and British calls for a no-fly zone over Libya.

"We are telling the west we want a no-fly zone, we want tactical strikes against those tanks and rockets that are being used against us and we want a strike against Gaddafi's compound," said Gheriani. "This is the message from our delegation in Europe."

Asked if that meant that the revolutionary council wanted the west to assassinate Gaddafi, Gheriani replied: "Why not? If he dies, nobody will shed a tear." 

__________________________________________

Alas, as the regime's tanks, artillery, and fighter jets make quick work of the rebels, the US has come out far less hawkish than the British and French... and they haven't gotten the already-useless NFZ proposal anywhere near a Security Council vote anyway:

[video/links]

On the other hand -although the rebel stronghold of Benghazi lies just 150 mi from the front lines now and appears militarily threatened- Gaddafi's forces would face a difficult type of urban warfare there and likely take significant casualties, something altogether different from their chasing disorganized and outgunned rebels across the desert. 

Additionally -with pro-regime supply lines stretched- the Libyan opposition will be defending their own homes and families. Rebel morale is holding up from most accounts, with Radio Behghazi even broadcasting a special Libyan rebel-rap song to the soldiers at the front. They've got an experienced new commander who recently defected from the Libyan Army, too- reportedly he's bringing 8000 men and heavy weapons with him.

But that doesn't mean they're still not plenty scared in Benghazi: all in Libya know the life expectancy of any enemy-of-Gaddafi-now-at-his-mercy can be measured in minutes. And the guy's as twisted a sadist as you could imagine: in 1984 The Leader scheduled the "trial" of a peaceful political protester -a respected engineer- in a basketball arena filled with Libyan schoolchildren: instead of a trial, the gallows were unveiled and he was promptly hanged...Gaddafi watched back home on live TV.

Most expect a horrendously bloody battle followed by battlefield massacres/mass executions if Benghazi falls to the regime: think Rwanda and you'll have an idea of what to expect from this vengeful, soulless monster: recall that both Gaddafi and son Saif have been promising "rivers of blood" right from the start...

__________________________________________

Al Jazeera's correspondent in the capital Tripoli said the offer will play on very anxious rebel forces who don't know how they will be able to put up a fight against Gaddafi's forces, given the overwhelming superiority of his military forces.

"There is an enormous degree of anxiety. It's an all or nothing game now," Anita McNaught said.

"If the rebels do not manage to hold out against Gaddafi and establish some kind of protective zone in the east of the country, it is almost certain in the wake of this there would be some dreadful purge of those who dared to raise their hands against the Gaddafi administration.

"People know that unless they are able to keep Tripoli at bay, that the alternative is almost too awful to contemplate. Those fears apply equally in Tripoli; they are just not expressed as openly as they are in the east."

__________________________________________

So how has Obama's inaction -while the rebels he claimed to support are cut to ribbons- gone over in Benghazi?

Rebel spokesman Mustafa Gheriani says that Obama's empty rhetoric -which created huge false expectations- will be causing the west problems in the future:

__________________________________________

...Libyans are also increasingly vocal in their criticism of Washington in particular for what is seen as a failure to back up rhetoric against the regime. 

However, Gheriani said that if the west failed to offer practical help to the revolutionaries to free themselves from Gaddafi's rule it risked frustrated Libyans turning to religious extremists.

"The west is missing the point. The revolution was started because people were feeling despair from poverty, from oppression. Their last hope was freedom. If the west takes too long – where people say it's too little, too late – then people become a target for extremists who say the west doesn't care about them," he said.

"Most people in this country are moderates and extremists have not been able to penetrate them. But if they get to the point of disillusionment with the west there will be no going back."

__________________________________________

And democracy advocates never had any choice but fight, according to former Libyan minister Ali Errishi:
:

__________________________________________

We are frustrated, the UN should live up to its moral and legal obligations, and do what is right, we are disappointed with the US for not exercising leadership.

People went out to demonstrate peacefully, they were then faced with bullets and with air bombardment. We had to defend ourselves. This fight has been imposed upon us.

The Libyan people made up their mind, it is either victory or death, the rest of the world should know, that there is no room for negations because the other side left no room for negotiations...

__________________________________________

VOA   The Guardian   Aljazeera   Nabou

More/updates at Reaganite Republican

[Carley]

The Libyan people took to the streets to cheer the return of the Pan Am bomber.

Sorry if I can’t bring myself to rush to your defense now.

[Jackson57]

Oh, Obama is exercising leadership ... just not the kind that will make the Middle East AND the United States safer.

[VeeP22]

Damned if we do damned if we don’t, same old story.

[mortal19440]

I thought that Hillary was meeting with the rebel leaders, didn’t she make them feel better about the U.S.?

[silverleaf]

Successful revolution demands that leadership come from within, not from outside

If these “opposition” spokesmen are not organized enough to overthrow Qadaffi they are not organized or well-lead enough to govern Libya

maybe they ought to explore longer-term more reasoned solutions and prepare THEMSELVES as leaders, rather than demanding we abet murder and honor mob violence as a way to “change” their lives

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

Well, I guess they should have treated that SAS team better than they did.

[Roccus]

Desperate Libyan Rebels Beg Dithering West to Assassinate Muammar Gaddafi

Wonder if they're "desperate" enough to beg the one country that truely knows how to do this....?

[Reaganite Republican]

Forgot to bring the “Restart” button lol

[Reaganite Republican]

Good question!

They’d get it done, too- real clean

[Jmouse007]

In other words = please kill him so the Muslim Brotherhood can take control and turn around and KILL Y O U!

No thanks, you want him dead, kill him yourself.

[hal ogen]

Please kill the Lockerbie Bomber first.

[Slump Tester]

So one bunch of muslims (who want to kill the Jews and us) is killing another bunch of muslims (who want to kill Jews and us.)

Which bunch of muslims (that want to kill Jews and us) are we supposed to help, and WHY?

[Pecos]

The rebels are simply in the position of wanting to use the leverage of a larger power to achieve their goals. I agree with an earlier poster who noted that Libyans cheered the return of the Pan Am bomber.

If you begin a revolution, be prepared to finish it. And, yes, I am capable of feeling bad about someone’s situation (brought on by their own actions) without feeling an obligation to fix it.

[CynicalBear]

If Gadafi stays in power he’s going to be a real friend to the Obozo administration for demanding he leave. /s

[Carley]

Neither option was good for US

O pushed our ally out of Egypt and now we have despots in charge, aided and abetted by Iran and Syria.

[SgtHooper]

Precisely. And why don’t other Islamic countries come to their aid? Do we ever see another middle eastern country helping another? Do we see another middle eastern country helping ANY other country? Ever? To the fires of hell for all of em.

[Reaganite Republican]

“If Gadafi stays in power he’s going to be a real friend to the Obozo administration for demanding he leave. /s”

That’s really what I’m on Obama for here- I am not necissarily saying we should intervene in any way, I dunno

BUT- Obama thought he’d waited as long as he could, then sided with the seeming winners, the rebels

I don’t know where he gets these ideas, but Gaddafi immediately set to rolling them up... and Obama does NOTHING

Why’d he go side with a bunch of kids with AK-47s and tell Gaddafi he “had to” step down? With NO plan to support them when Gaddafi laughed it off and started bombing

The Libyans knew this smiley plastic mannequin wasn’t going to do anything!

[Reaganite Republican]

Saudi Arabia sent 1000 troops to Bahrain yesterday lol