[NoGrayZone]

"Who said I disagreed with his article? Another diversionary tactic."

Then what is your problem? If you TRULY felt is was a "bad thing" to click onto another bloggers post, you would not have done so.

Now, if you had stated "you could not agree or disagree with B&R's post because I refuse to click on an outside blog", you would have SOME cred.

[humblegunner]

It’s hard to agree or disagree with it because only 2 of 9 paragraphs are posted.

He’s free to post the whole thing. Why do you suppose he did not?

He wants blog hits. He’s USING you. He’s TRICKING you.

Sucker.

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

I didn’t click on it so I can’t say if I agree or not. He only posted two paragraphs and is using them as bait to get hits. Low.