Christopher is a smart and savvy guy, and I wouldn't underestimate his opinion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Is that even possible?
26 posted on
03/03/2011 11:32:50 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Christopher N. Malagisi is the Lead Administrator of the Draft Newt Gingrich for President (2012) Facebook fan pageReal unbiased source you have here. He needs to spend more time outside of Washington DC to see how grassroots conservatives feel about Beltway insiders such as himself and Newt.
27 posted on
03/03/2011 11:33:31 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
No doubt that Gingrichs greatest obstacle will be to win over the social conservatives. He will have to explain his personal foibles Serving divorce papers on your wife when she is hospitalized for breast cancer is far beyond a mere "personal foible."
I have a high opinion of Newt's intellect but his personal life has made him unelectable IMO.
29 posted on
03/03/2011 11:37:44 AM PST by
freespirited
(Truth is the new hate speech. -- Pamela Geller)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Repudiate your climate change position and then we can talk Newt. Not promising I can still believe you though.
30 posted on
03/03/2011 11:39:33 AM PST by
DManA
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
I’d vote for him, big time.
31 posted on
03/03/2011 11:41:42 AM PST by
unique
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
33 posted on
03/03/2011 11:45:53 AM PST by
DManA
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Newt has been vetted more than anyone else in the field. Where he had some rather large screw-ups in the 90’s, none of those mistakes come close those of Mitt. It may be his time!
My thoughts:
Newt Gingrich: The one person who would give Obama fits in any debate! He is the single candidate who Obama absolutely fears!
Chris Christie: Sharp, tough and nasty. Would be very good. Not a good #2
Bob McDonnell: May be a sleeper. Very good and can not run again for Gov.
Mitch Daniels: Good man, a proven record, may be #2
Michele Bachmann: May be a good #2 or better as future Speaker.
Jim DeMint: Good man but he does not have the debating skills needed.
John Thune: He is not interested in #1 but may be good #2.
Mike Pence: Good man.
Paul Ryan: We need him where he is. Good #2.
Sarah Palin: Don't think so. Love her and most of all TRUST her but....
Tim Pawlenty: Not really. A little Rino-ish.
Mike Huckabee: NO but I like him as a person.
Jon Huntsman: NO, has worked for Obama in China.
Marco Rubio: Not yet and soft on illegal immigration
Bobby Jindal: No
Scott Brown: No
Mitt Romney: ABSOLUTE NOT, NEVER!!
34 posted on
03/03/2011 11:48:56 AM PST by
WellyP
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
I will not be surprised if the candidate is someone who has not seen the spotlight yet, a complete dark horse.
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
41 posted on
03/03/2011 11:55:03 AM PST by
Patrsup
(To stubborn to change now)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Maybe Dede Scozzafava can be Newt's running mate is San Fran Nan isn't available.
43 posted on
03/03/2011 11:55:58 AM PST by
bwc2221
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
I suppose when it comes to morals and family values, he’s going to love answering questions about serving divorce papers on his wife while she was being treated for cancer
Newt Gingrich: the Bill Clinton of the GOP (except that Bill didn’t divorce Hillary to marry his mistress...).
47 posted on
03/03/2011 12:17:29 PM PST by
Little Ray
(The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Even he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of getting the nomination, let alone winning the office, I think he would be a real plus in the primary season. IMHO he has a better understanding of how government works and the history of America than any of the other possible candidates.
Again, IMHO, it's foolish to deprive our cause of the good that could come from having him in the debates and on the campaign trail because we don't like him personally. His presence in the mix would make others really have to mind their p’s and q’s when it comes to knowing what makes America, and voters, tick.
52 posted on
03/03/2011 12:38:57 PM PST by
jwparkerjr
(I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Noot lost me at Scozzafava.
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
54 posted on
03/03/2011 12:41:15 PM PST by
Colonel_Flagg
("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Then you liberals will have to coronate him King, because there are no real Conservatives that will vote for that adulterous, gw believing, nancy pelosi loving pudge ball.
LLS
56 posted on
03/03/2011 12:57:01 PM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES!!!)
To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
Living in Iowa and being a Republican activist, we have a steady diet of politics. Just yesterday during serious discussions about who is viable, who isn't, etc., the subject came around to Newt.
Newt is still on our possibility list and yes, we know about his 3 marriages and it's certainly a minus, but we can't find Jesus, yet, and any of our flawed candidates are far better than Obama.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson