Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 02/28/2011 4:52:57 PM PST by PROCON
The Berkeley Earth project say they are about to reveal the definitive truth about global warming In 1964, Richard Muller, a 20-year-old graduate student with neat-cropped hair, walked into Sproul Hall at the University of California, Berkeley, and joined a mass protest of unprecedented scale. The activists, a few thousand strong, demanded that the university lift a ban on free speech and ease restrictions on academic freedom, while outside on the steps a young folk-singer called Joan Baez led supporters in a chorus of We Shall Overcome. The sit-in ended two days later when police stormed the building in the early hours and arrested hundreds of students
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
Fine! If that's your goal, it's commendable; however, be prepared to discover the AGW "consensus" is wrong!
Ping-a-ling!
This is pre-global Cooling
What makes them different from any other Berkely crowd?
What makes them special that their final word is the final word?
Sorry, but I doubt they will be spending millions to investigate and look for all the natural climate enactors out there, they probably will troll through what has already been gathered by others.
Proving Global Warming is one thing, Proving Human Induced Armageddon Global Warming is another thing.
If they come up with anything less then they are confirming the hoax.
The earth has been warming for hundreds of years since the last ice age. This is part of the normal cycle of the earth.
>>”We are an independent, non-political, non-partisan group.<<
Yeah, right. Any sane conservative knows that it’s a scam and won’t waste their time proving something that never existed in the first place. Which leaves the “other” political spectrum..
The reality is that humans are biased and fallible. All of us. Pretending that you are not doesn't get you any closer to the truth.
Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'
It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming
Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.
Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud
That article pretty much puts the kibosh on any serious trend of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign at all of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? Beyond the centuries long slow warming of the earth and rising of the seas of course. But that is only a few millimeters per century due to the inter-glacial period we are in.
Hell... they will just reprint what they read on the du.
LLS
That's what you find the public detecting the most of ~ the disconnect between real statistical analysis and the claims made for the data.
Of interest ~ I started out as a Math major ages back and spent a good deal of the last 50 years fiddling around with statistical methodologies. Not that I could be all that productive any more in that field but even I recognized that there were serious questions about the AGW data sets quite early on. For example, there were only three climatological sites in Republic of Congo. One day the staff were working happily collecting temperatures and humidity readings and along came a group of rebel soldiers who saw these nice plump guys and killed them, then dressed them out, cooked and ate them.
I began disputing ALL of the weather station data in Africa based on that event. We had an early website where a United Nations weather guy was a member. We went back and forth on the reliability of data coming from stations where the data collectors were so readily eaten.
He had no good answers for it.
I’m with you FRiend, and I look forward to their final report; if the data is to be revealed for all to see, we may be able to put to bed this scam for good!
Delusions anyone?
Here is the source for you new and improved delusions.
Free for the taking. No charge.
Enjoy the results but don’t really expect much else then rewording of earlier Global Warming Thesis’s.
They still don’t like free speech
I smell whitewash.
Or is that horse manure?
I believe the project is expected by its sponsors to reaffirm the findings of the original “climategate” scientists in order to give the Democrat “mainstream” newsrooms something to hang their hats on as they soundbite into their daily headline stories about renewed efforts for “cap and trade” legislation and other massive taxpayer ripoffs:
“BREAKING NEWS!!... Global warming turns out to be a critical threat to our planet after all, according to a totally objective and completely bipartisan group of top scientists who reaffirmed the conclusions of over 160 thousand previous top scientists who claimed that we must act now to stop blah blah blah.”
Bookmarked.
I have strong doubts that they will report anything if it becomes clear to them that they can actually disprove Glowbull Warming theories.
The temperature data are all erroneous or suspect to begin with. Can’t get around that no matter how much hand-waving is done.
Well, the saying goes:
“garbage in, garbage out”
If “the data” that they use is biased, fudged, or just plain made up then the results will be the same stuff we get from people like Gore, drivel. Is there any “objective” data for them to gather? Will they start fresh and gather new data? Exactly what would they factor in, and would they model?
I’m not a scientist, but I know you have to have good data and enough of it to make conclusions based on it, and the results have to be repeatable. I don’t think we are going to see any of that happening. I think we are going to see a ton of money go down a rabbit hole for a pre-destined conclusion that will co-incidentally get them much more grant and funding $$.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.