Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Statement by the Department of Justice
1 posted on 02/23/2011 12:35:32 PM PST by Bridgetteb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Bridgetteb

and so, what other laws will obama and holder decide not to enforce? Since now it is pick-and-choose time


2 posted on 02/23/2011 12:37:21 PM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

Only a judge can they cannot.


3 posted on 02/23/2011 12:39:43 PM PST by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

Thomas Jefferson would agree with this philosophy.


5 posted on 02/23/2011 12:41:55 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

I think the timing here is curious. Is might be an attempt to distract from the absolute failures in the responses to Tunisia, Egypt, Iran and Wisconsin in the last couple weeks. Create a diversion discuss it, then say never mind.


6 posted on 02/23/2011 12:43:29 PM PST by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb
Obama chooses to ignore Article I when he bypasses advice and consent and appoints czars.

Obama chooses to ignore Articles I and III when he ignores court rulings on the oil drilling moratorium and the unconstitutionality of Obama care.

Obama chooses to ignore Article IV when he becomes personally involved in overthrowing the Republican Form of Government in Wisconsin.

I'm thinking about ignoring Article II when I stop thinking of Obama as President.

-PJ

7 posted on 02/23/2011 12:44:16 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (In a democracy, you negotiate from the floor of the legislature, not from hideouts and bullhorns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

Lawless bastards.


8 posted on 02/23/2011 12:44:37 PM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

Oh yeah. A follow-up. Correct me if I’m wrong, but my uneducated (non-lawyer) of the law suggests that the Pres and the DOJ can’t declare something unconstitutional. It has to pass Congress or go through a ruling in a court.

Is this understanding correct?


9 posted on 02/23/2011 12:46:42 PM PST by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

What is happening in our country that elected officials can pick and choose when they want to vote on a bill or run away; that our president and his minions can pick and choose which judgments or laws they want to obey. I feel so helpless.


10 posted on 02/23/2011 12:46:44 PM PST by Ray'sBeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb
There should be no government involvement nor any recognition of a religious ritual. Civil ceremonies were the creation of royalists, statists and religious fascists to control the sexual activity of others.

Conservatives do not want the government regulating the use of their private parts.

11 posted on 02/23/2011 12:53:36 PM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

The OBAMA REGIME = RULE OF UTTER LAWLESSNESS


13 posted on 02/23/2011 1:07:20 PM PST by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

I’m still waiting for some group to start going Egypt on the A$$hole of a president.


15 posted on 02/23/2011 1:16:23 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

I thought constitutionality was to be decided by the Supreme Court. I guess Zero is saying, “Not in my administration”.


17 posted on 02/23/2011 1:23:30 PM PST by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bridgetteb

We redefined “natural born citizen”.
We redefined “marriage”.
We redefined “the judiciary”.

What’s next?


19 posted on 02/23/2011 2:37:52 PM PST by djf (Dems and liberals: Let's redefine "marriage". We already redefined "natural born citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson