To: EternalVigilance
Let's not forget that Palin also supports the morning-after pill being legal and taxpayer funding for abortion in the case of rape and has never expressed a bit of regret for having appointed a former Planned Parenthood board member to the Alaska Supreme Court all while praising the judge in question in Going Rogue.
And, let's not forget this comment from Going Rogue where she writes she does not use "abortion... as a political litmust test. I... had never asked anyone, including the Democrats I appointed, what their position on abortion was..."
12 posted on
02/21/2011 9:40:02 PM PST by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: Ol' Sparky
As you know, because it was discussed on one of your threads the other day, she was sent two pro-abortion candidates for that judgeship and had to pick one of those two, period. She picked the less liberal of the two, or do you perhaps have early-onset dementia or Alzheimer’s?
16 posted on
02/21/2011 9:43:11 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(We need more Democrats in the Senate --Like Custer needed more arrows.)
To: Ol' Sparky
Glad to see someone has actually looked at her record, not just listened to some meaningless lip service.
23 posted on
02/21/2011 9:49:35 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
(No President who performs his duties faithfully and conscientiously can have any leisure. - JK Polk)
To: Ol' Sparky
Maybe she realized that anyone at a State level judicial position would have absolutely NO effect on abortion laws, so why would it matter?
109 posted on
02/21/2011 11:42:49 PM PST by
SuziQ
To: Ol' Sparky
...and has never expressed a bit of regret for having appointed a former Planned Parenthood board member to the Alaska Supreme Court... Sparky obviously didn't learn his lesson on the last thread about deliberate errors of omission. Even Jim mocked him by adding an important fact to the title of his post.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson