We did this back in 2009.
1. Judge Morgan Christen was the most qualified candidate
2. This was the alternative Palin chose against
And yes you can judge by appearences. Back then FR survey said he was a freakin' moonbat.
*WARNING*
*DISCOURAGEMNT TROLL*
McCain made her do it right?
Unhhh, maybe because that isn’t the one and only litmus test applied when appointing a judge?
Why did Palin name a pro-choice judge to the Alaska Supreme Court?
_____________________________________________________
Asked and answered. In before the Aw Jeez guy.
Which was the case.
Sarah, according to Bailey, refused to listen to his or Van Flein's advice.
Hell hath no fury like an advisor ignored ... who later wants to sell his book.
With reagrds to this piece of democrat agenda:
isn’t it interesting how they’re pulling out all the stops to try and attack Palin now?
When they say “she has no chance against buma”!
Buma is finished. The American people do not want this kind of president. Pretty much whoever we run in 2012 wins. Unless it’s a democrat like McCain or Romney. You can’t out-democrat a democrat.
ok...here we go again...i am ready to be flamed..
there is this pesky little thingie called the constitution...in it is the pesky little thingie called the 10th amendment...last time I checked abortion, along with a host of other things, is not a power specifically granted to the feds, therefore, should be a state issue. Now, if this were true, then the appointment of, or election of, an abortion backing judge or governor, would be a major issue. However, since the feds have been allowed to remove this power from the states, what difference does it make what a state judge or governors stand is on the issue????? the feds will render any decision moot if it does not agree with the trumping of the constitution they have achieved......so tell me, what differnce does the stand of a judge or governor make??? answer is none...wanna change things??? start with your local state representative and senate candidate..they can force a governor to stand up to the fed... unless this happens, the point is moot..
I read the words ‘reign as governor’ and stopped. Only in the fused circuits of liberal/progressive heads are executives of US states also heads of state. Hint to liberals and trolls: kings reign, governors govern. See the difference? Really simple isn’t it?
It’s got me “concerned.”
I suggest the author look into how judge nominations are chosen/appointed in AK. Possible candidates are chosen buy the Alacka Judicial Council. The Governor must choose fromt that list. They must not have sent her a pro-life candidate. What was she to do? Ignore the law?
Oops.
A simple Google search reveals Craig Medred is a grade-A hack. But I guess in your hurry to post this hit piece on Palin, you couldn’t be bothered to see if the author is a credible source.
Info on Devon, if you don't already know;
http://saberpoint.blogspot.com/2009/07/jeannie-devon-alaskan-liberal-democrat.html
There were only 2 choices presented to her by the Commission. Alaska has that “Missouri Plan” nonsense. Palin picked the least bad of the two. The other one was an across the board leftist wacko.
Because it’s politics. You have two choices: learn to live with people you vehemently disagree with, or go to civil war.
We did this back in 2009.
1. Judge Morgan Christen was the most qualified candidate
2. This was the alternative Palin chose against
And yes you can judge by appearences. Back then FR survey said he was a freakin' moonbat.
Hey PDSer troll! So you know that this allege book by Bailey was written by a Huffington Post writer and a known Alaska lib (Mudflats) and was leaked by the loon Joe McGinness....the guy that moved next door to Sarah and her family to write a hit-piece book. But that doesnt matter to you and since the guy has been backtracking on what he wrote Sarah said by saying that the book was subject to change.....but alas it doesn’t matter to you libs