Replies

Prove Beck wrong.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Obama, 2008 campaign. You know, he neither said who ‘we’ is, nor did he specify the nation(s) the civilians would be in (presumably the US). Nor did he name the security objectives.

Research does show the age of ME/African leaders/dictators is older in comparison to the youth of the population, and so these countries are ripe fruit for change in governance. I posted a big map on yesterday’s Beck TV thread about this.....

“Inspire” is the name of al-Qaeda’s magazine.

Links:

Soros East Africa initiative: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/osiea

ME & North Africa:
http://www.soros.org/initiatives/mena/about

Kenya e-Gov Conference, 2011: http://afrinnovator.com/events/kenya-e-gov-conference-2011

Link to more info on the UN’s ‘Alliance of Civilizarions’:http://www.unaoc.org/content/view/91/126/lang,english/
Suggest reading up on the ‘Rapid Response Media’ section and the ‘Dialogue Cafe.’

May be innocuous, but with Riseup.net (See: https://help.riseup.net/about-us/political-principles/) & Movements.org, it’s not so clear. The Blaze & Big Peace have picked up the Red-Green Alliance story.

IMO, we are witnessing the increase of orchestrated, asymmetrical, cyber-warfare of the technical types we’ve trained here in the US. And major corporations like Google, etc., are in on it.

To say Beck is dead on about the ME is an understatement. I am in complete agreement with him. Expressing ‘I’ in Arabic is often done through a preposition, as though people are by-products of something bigger.

No one else in media with his venue is speaking on these topics. And Fox is OK with it. He must have serious legal counsel advising what he can and cannot say; hence, the Ghandi stance on TV.

He has the best security in the world, as he has said. That’s expensive and isn’t there for fluff.

I truly, truly disagree with his stance on the BC issue, though. And I wish he had more ‘fun’ stories like he did a ways back. But the man is a voice crying in the wilderness to those who will listen. He can make me cringe and feel at a loss about what to do, and I do want to do something. However, I believe our government is so infiltrated that this is going to take each of us to do our part, including our own research.

One final, rhetorical thought for consideration: would each of us be willing to go out with a poster of some kind or a handout at some public corner and stand alone to speak to this issue? I know, with the number of Muslims and mosques in this area, I would feel uncomfortable without like-minded others, and I have espoused these convictions about what would transpire in the ME for nearly 35 years—and was called nuts for it for much of that time.

So, prove Beck wrong.