Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Massive majority opposes raising debt limit
The American Thinker Blog ^ | February 07, 2011 | Rick Moran

Posted on 02/08/2011 2:43:38 AM PST by Scanian

It's only one poll - The Hill's survey of likely voters - but it could mean trouble for President Obama and the Democrats:

"Only 27 percent of likely voters favor raising the nation's $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, while 62 percent oppose it, according to an exclusive poll for The Hill. The poll found solid opposition from Republicans and also from independent voters, who are critical to President Obama's re-election in 2012.

"Seventy-seven percent of likely GOP voters and 64 percent of independent voters said they don't want the debt ceiling to be raised. Even among Democrats, more oppose raising the ceiling (46 percent) than support it (42 percent).

"Winning the congressional vote to raise the debt ceiling is a crucial test for the president. House and Senate Republicans are using the vote, which must take place soon, in an effort to secure deep spending cuts from the White House.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and White House officials warn of dire consequences if the debt ceiling is not raised.

"Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke also warned lawmakers last week not to use the vote as a bargaining chip, saying it would be 'catastrophic' if the nation defaulted. But the poll, conducted by Pulse Opinion Research among 1,000 likely voters, suggests the administration's message is not resonating beyond the Beltway."

The poll also asked about the stim bill. 48% to 36% believe the stim bill failed to create jobs, including 61% of indies.

It's not just administration officials and the Fed Chairman who are sounding the alarm about not raising the debt ceiling; respected economists from both sides of the aisle also warn of dire consequences if the US defaults.

But there are those few who point out there may be a way around default even if we don't raise the limit on debt. Accounting gimmicks and even a "pay as you go" government where government revenue as it comes in is used to pay off creditors is employed. Eventually, all of those schemes will run up against a hard ceiling and the US will officially be in default.

Is this something to wish for? Many will wish it were so - perhaps enough to prevent raising the ceiling. If that be the case, I guess we'll find out what happens together.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: democrats; likelyvoters; obama; opposition

1 posted on 02/08/2011 2:43:42 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I say default and start over. They are absolutely bankrupt. A national chapter 13 would do the trick. Constitutional Bankruptcy. The Federal Government should be put back in its constitutional box.


2 posted on 02/08/2011 2:59:58 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Let there be ‘dire consequences.” It’s time to take the medicine.


3 posted on 02/08/2011 3:40:28 AM PST by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I’m With you, We could stop All government functions and only pay the debt with no tax reduction and it would take 14 years to free ourselves... We are in BIG trouble and so many want to close their eyes to these facts.

41 cents of every dollar goes to debt not to government operations, This means we are beyond wake-up time!


4 posted on 02/08/2011 4:21:04 AM PST by jafojeffsurf (Return to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jafojeffsurf

Totally agree with what your saying. That being said the government will vote to raise the debt limit.

It’s a given, whatever the “people” want and doing what is right means the government will do the complete opposite.


5 posted on 02/08/2011 4:41:13 AM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA, You can't fix stupid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Yes but they are against specific spending cuts, and they are for tax cuts (at least theirs.) Think a Republican president would fare well with voters that are so conflicted?


6 posted on 02/08/2011 4:55:56 AM PST by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Totally agree with what your saying. That being said the government will vote to raise the debt limit.

I agree to a point. I agree that they will probably increase the debt, but I don't think they'll call it that. I think they'll shuffle debt around and the Fed will buy more of it and they'll cut some token expenses and then tell us all how much money was saved.

hell, a great example is jobs. every day I see some new post about how unemployment is down. I'd like to see a new "U" number. maybe U30 can be "people who are working and earning within 10% of what they averaged 10 years ago". It's sickening to see the numbers and as a smart poster did the math yesterday, if you add up all the people they claim are in the work force, we're missing a hundreds of thousands of people. /rant.
7 posted on 02/08/2011 6:51:32 AM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson