I am going through and reading the posts here one by one, and something occurs to me...
We are being run in circles at this time.
I am not saying that we should give up on this, because I don’t believe that at all. But we must take up an issue which is related, but just as serious.
I would not matter if Obama was born in Hawai’i, or in Washington D.C. It is his parentage which precludes Natural Born Citizenship, not his place of birth.
It is Obama’s parentage which precludes Natural Born Citizenship.
Obama has forcefully put forward that this is his real parentage as if being born under the British Nationality Act of 1948 is ok. It is not.
Hawai’i breaking it’s laws, the clear potential for fraud, coverups, and all the other illegal activites seemingly undertaken on Obama’s behalf are a HUGE issue, and not one that should be dropped either.
But we must also stress, Obama’s stated parentage is what makes him an Usurper. This is evidence we have, evidence Obama has coorborated, and is ultimately his achilles heel.
No matter where Obama was born, he could never be a Natural Born Citizen having been born British, which is what “Born under the British Nationality Act of 1948” MEANS.
Right now I’m helping to close loopholes in an eligibility bill that’s been introduced in Nebraska which operates according to Vattel’s definition of NBC. It’s been referred to committee but isn’t scheduled for a hearing yet. I and another person are working with Sen Christensen’s office to develop amendments which will close some loopholes in the bill as initially introduced.
We will need help from as many people as possible, to let our senators know why this bill is important and should be passed with the amendments that Christensen will propose.
If this bill is passed the DOJ will certainly challenge its constitutionality and the courts will end up having to rule on the definition of NBC. Whatever documentation requirements in the bill are in line with the definition they come up with will remain in effect and Obama will have to provide that documentation.
We are working on an amendment that would give standing for any registered NE voter to challenge an eligibility decision in court and allow them to subpoena any necessary documents as well as the embedded and written transaction logs and records for each document.
If we can get this bill amended and passed as amended this will be the real deal.
But the media will be against us all the way. There’s already been an article published about it, quoting some poli sci professor claiming to know nothing about anybody even thinking that parents’ citizenship is relevant. So we’re pushing to make sure that we get the NBC issue resolved but it seems like that is going to be what the media will hone in on to try to label the bill as “extreme”.