OK. Just realize that I’m trying to help butter by being generalized in my responses. You know as I do that geeks like us tend to get caught up in details and specifics. She doesn’t need that. It doesn’t help her.
You’ve been very helpful, and I appreciate it immensely. The counsel you’ve given is not limiting in any way that I can see so I’m doubtful that it would be intended to trip up the intent of making sure that the truth is found.
You don’t have to actually think that Obama’s records are screwed up to recognize that we need a way to check the integrity of records and make sure that presidential eligibility is met by EVERY POTUS.
I think the state eligibility bills issue reveals the people who really ARE “Obots”. Those who aren’t Obots but just aren’t convinced (yet. lol) that Obama is ineligible will actually welcome measures that will get us the answers we need in order to carry out the Constitutional requirements. And for all the past history with “birthers” and the conflicts we’ve had between the two of us even, it seems like you do welcome lawful resolution of the issue, BT. I’ll just let that fact speak for itself.
The only people who could be against the very idea of a common-sense law to insure that presidents are eligible are those who know Obama isn’t eligible and are committed to hiding that fact. The details of a particular bill can be argued, but the basic wisdom of having such a law should be an absolute given for anybody who loves the US Constitution.
I’m really happy for a chance for honest people on both sides of the OBAMA eligibility issue to still stand together to protect the US Constitution. Because that’s what this is really about. It’s about the rule of law. We can agree on the need for that even if we disagree about a lot of other things.