Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FL Judge Rules Against Obamacare, Injunction Denied As Unnecessary Since Entire Law Unconstitutional
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion ^ | January 31, 2011 | Professor William A. Jacobson, Cornell Law School

Posted on 01/31/2011 12:35:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Federal Judge Roger Vinson of the Northern District of Florida, in a lawsuit by 26 state attorney generals, has held that Obamacare is unconstitutional. Judge Vinson first found that the mandate was unconstitutional, and then found that the mandate could not be severed from the rest of the law, requiring that the entire law be deemed unconstitutional. Judge Vinson found that there was no need for an injunction, since the declaratory judgment that the entire law was invalid was sufficient (in effect, there is nothing left to enjoin, since no part of the law survived).

Here is the conclusion of the Order:

"The existing problems in our national health care system are recognized by everyone in this case. There is widespread sentiment for positive improvements that will reduce costs, improve the quality of care, and expand availability in a way that the nation can afford. This is obviously a very difficult task. Regardless of how laudable its attempts may have been to accomplish these goals in passing the Act, Congress must operate within the bounds established by the Constitution. Again, this case is not about whether the Act is wise or unwise legislation. It is about the Constitutional role of the federal government.

For the reasons stated, I must reluctantly conclude that Congress exceeded the bounds of its authority in passing the Act with the individual mandate. That is not to say, of course, that Congress is without power to address the problems and inequities in our health care system. The health care market is more than one sixth of the national economy, and without doubt Congress has the power to reform and regulate this market. That has not been disputed in this case. The principal dispute has been about how Congress chose to exercise that power here.

Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire Act must be declared void. This has been a difficult decision to reach, and I am aware that it will have indeterminable implications. At a time when there is virtually unanimous agreement that health care reform is needed in this country, it is hard to invalidate and strike down a statute titled “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” ... In closing, I will simply observe, once again, that my conclusion in this case is based on an application of the Commerce Clause law as it exists pursuant to the Supreme Court’s current interpretation and definition. Only the Supreme Court (or a Constitutional amendment) can expand that.

For all the reasons stated above and pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 80) is hereby GRANTED as to its request for declaratory relief on Count I of the Second Amended Complaint, and DENIED as to its request for injunctive relief; and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 82) is hereby GRANTED on Count IV of the Second Amended Complaint. The respective cross-motions are each DENIED. In accordance with Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2201(a), a Declaratory Judgment shall be entered separately, declaring “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” unconstitutional."

Florida Health Care Mandate Lawsuit, Summary Judgement Order (At link or web address below) http://www.scribd.com/doc/47906075/Florida-Health-Care-Mandate-Lawsuit-Summary-Judgment-Order


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhohealthcare; congress; florida; healthcare; judgevinson; obama; obamacare; socialisthealthcare; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
ObamaCare ist Kaput!
1 posted on 01/31/2011 12:35:29 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So I guess we’re on to the Supreme Court with the inevitable challenge to this judge’s ruling?


2 posted on 01/31/2011 12:38:04 PM PST by Josa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Nachum

PRAISE GOD!


3 posted on 01/31/2011 12:38:38 PM PST by GailA (2012 rally cry DEMOCRATS and RINOS are BAD for the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know what the Obama regime will pull in response to this, but for the moment I can only say God bless this patriot Judge. If there is one thing this country needs right now...it is patriots.


4 posted on 01/31/2011 12:41:19 PM PST by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I like it. Now that a federal court has found it unconstitutional it probably gets booted to the US Supreme Court on a fast track to see if they want to touch this hot potato.

This is going to get real interesting with budgets, since Republicans can say we aren't funding anything that is found to be unconstitutional and we are not allowing agencies to start writing regulations for something that has been found to be unconstitutional.

At the very least, ObahmaCare has been set back 3 to 9 months, if not totally scrapped.

5 posted on 01/31/2011 12:42:21 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

Patriot or not the judge is a constitutionalist and that is as good as a patriot.

FUBO & FAD


6 posted on 01/31/2011 12:43:16 PM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

I pray the SC refuses to hear it.

I can just hear chrissy mathews now. “This judge is a right wing nut who was probably in the kkk.”


7 posted on 01/31/2011 12:44:59 PM PST by Terry Mross (We need a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And the thugs running our government will completely ignore the ruling, as usual. Naturally, the media will excoriate them for it.BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


8 posted on 01/31/2011 12:45:09 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josa

Will SCOTUS say that we serfs have “no standing?”


9 posted on 01/31/2011 12:45:15 PM PST by Frantzie (Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

will Obama and the NAACP now declare the Judge a racist?


10 posted on 01/31/2011 12:46:17 PM PST by JohnThune2012 (was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

[that my conclusion in this case is based on an application of the Commerce Clause law as it exists pursuant to the Supreme Court’s current interpretation and definition. Only the Supreme Court (or a Constitutional amendment) can expand that.]

This concerns me. The USSC should not be in the business of expanding the power of the federal gov’t. The Constitution grants the powers that it grants and any additional power requires a constitutional amendment!


11 posted on 01/31/2011 12:47:47 PM PST by KansasGirl (Note to self: proofread BEFORE pushing Post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


12 posted on 01/31/2011 12:47:56 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Josa
So I guess we’re on to the Supreme Court

Appellate court is the next step . Also, the obamanauts will undoubtedly ask for a stay pending the outcome of the appeal. Let's hope they don't get granted a stay or Obamacare might go into effect before the appeal gets heard. The obamunists will also try to get a contrary decision in another jurisdiction in case the appellate court for Florida doesn't want to hear their appeal.

13 posted on 01/31/2011 12:48:50 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnThune2012

Without a doubt!


14 posted on 01/31/2011 12:49:06 PM PST by KansasGirl (Note to self: proofread BEFORE pushing Post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

26 States involved...Excellent!!!


15 posted on 01/31/2011 12:49:47 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama & Pelosi taken to the woodshed.


16 posted on 01/31/2011 12:54:35 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

we should still not depend on the SCOTUS though


17 posted on 01/31/2011 12:55:00 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
You can read the Court's Opinion here:

UnConstitutional Law Passed by the Democratic Party, Obama Care

Download and read on your computer, it is 78 pages long.
18 posted on 01/31/2011 1:00:04 PM PST by Thanatos (With Liberals like we have, why have allies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Pelosi’s cocktail waiters couldn’t be bothered to put a few hard returns into the 3,000+ pages therefore there is no severability therefore the whole thing is O - U - T.


19 posted on 01/31/2011 1:02:17 PM PST by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


"Must people DIE because their right to health care was taken away from this here Bill of Rights? Can't the country that allowed Neil Armstrong to plant the American flag on Mars do better than the people of North Vietnam?"
20 posted on 01/31/2011 1:02:47 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson