Replies

actually we've both written it several times, although not *quite* the same wording...

FUBO and the wookie ya rode in on...

a 'fair' fight is what the commies want when they dont have a winning hand, whilst at any other time they go all down & dirty...

again i say eff em and ifn they 'get in my face' or 'bring a gun'...well then lets just GIT-R DONE...

*if* they can manage to keep the festivities to 'discourse' I'll be more than amazed, and will gladly give them the same voice that theyve givien me in my time on this planet, which aint but a patronizing minute or two, beyond that, they can KMA and get hell outta the way...

sadly, my *representatives* will bend over far enuff to kiss their own and ultimately leave little recourse for us...Pray it aint so, but i dont hold much hope that we will see hardball from anyone but bloggers in the near future...

in that vein, the rin-o-p establishment that caves and fights fair in the distric of criminals can KMA as well...

not harsh enuff ??? need more vitriol ??? "BITE ME"...8^}

I just realized another reason why this "Civil Discourse" bullshit strikes a nerve with me.

Remember back a few years ago when Israel was kicking some serious butt of the malicious Arabs in their areas? I "think" it was when they were whooping up on Hamas when they took control of the government through "democratic" elections.

Anyway... Israel was being VERY effective at killing the little bastards before they could do a lot of harm. Then suddenly, Hamas called something known as a Hudna. The MSM as well as Hamas said it was a ceasefire. But less obscure and more conservative news sources (as well as Israel) said that it merely meant to "regroup and rearm". As it turned out, the definition was the latter...to regroup and rearm.

This cry for civil discourse is a lot like those murderous rag heads calling for Hudna. They have an ulterior motive. The morons participated in violent rhetoric until one of their one lost control and murdered six people, so now they cry for civil discourse. But that's not what they want. I think down under it all, they know (as we do!) that another Loughner will be very bad for them. I think they've produced a certain subculture that they've lost control over. This subculture is so far left of them that it's feeling disenfranchised and is willing to commit violence in order to bring their little leftist utopia into being. Everybody knows at least somebody like this.

The fact is that we've said very little that would indicate we would initiate violence against them. Now granted, we showed up at TEA Party gatherings ARMED, and open carry events ARMED, and we're known to be ARMED. But we're not much when it comes to making threats. In fact, all in all we're a pretty friendly bunch. They on the other hand are vile, profane, and aggressive towards anybody who doesn't embrace diversity, worship their junk science of global warming, want to free Tibet, or support a woman's right to choose.

They can "ask" for civil discourse, but they won't get it. The fact is that they don't know how to participate in it and never did. There's nothing civil about them. They're vile and aggressive and nothing that comes from their mouths is ever completely true.

I for one have no intention of being any more civil with them than I've been all along. Furthermore, I'll be communicating to my legislators that they too should ignore this hypocritical and disingenuous request.