Posted on 01/15/2011 8:31:49 AM PST by FredJake
Actually, Chrissy Matthews on Softball called out Mark Levin by name.
Gotta love him though.
Dearest Mark, Governor Palin and Rush Limbaugh were named as responsible for the “rhetoric” that caused these deaths. Would you be willing to defend them?? I’d love to see these irresponsible liberal accusers get it in court.
Oh good. I’d hate for Mark to feel that he wasn’t important enough to be included in the MSM blamefest.
I don’t think they’d have the b@lls to go near that pitbull! They KNOW better! LOL! Too bad. I’d love to see it.
I can see it now
Judge telling Matthews:” Mr. Matthews please refrain from spitting on Mr. Levin while under cross examination”
LOL
Purely legal question: What if a madman killer DID listen to something someone in the media said, and in his sick mind USE that as a reason to kill?
In this AZ case, that did not happen. Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh had NO INFLUENCE at all in any stretch of the imagination over this ill man.
But what if something one of them had said DID lead to a twisted connection in the fertile mind of a sociopath, as the Beatles song “Helter Skelter” did for Charles Manson?
Can you all IMAGINE what they would do to Rush Limbaugh if some harmless sentence he said was twisted into “Must kill Giffords” in the mind of some nutcase?? Would Rush already be hanging dead and naked, upside down, over a bridge?????
We need to remember that it was not the fault of Lennon or McCartney that their song about a teeter-totter (and probably sex) was NOT an invitation to start a race war in which the blacks would take over the whites and we should go out and start to kill the rich whities.
We need to remember that Jody Foster at 13 was NOT responsible for trying to assassinate the President, nor were her producers and director, just because she was dressed as a child prostitute in a movie.
The conservative talkers and politicians who are being blamed for “angry rhetoric” that this AZ killer never listened to, have their RIGHT to talk about what they wish, unless they are exhorting to literal violence or murder, in which it would be irresponsible to give them any air time.
Please also remember that the true public exhortations to violence and murder against opposing politicians come from people like Alec Baldwin, on the Left, where he cried out on national television for Henry Hyde’s entire family to be murdered.
It is pure insanity that we are defending Rush and Sarah when not one phrase of theirs was used to cause these murders, but even if Loughner HAD listened, and twisted the message, Rush and Sarah are still not to blame.
The dog who “influenced” Son of Sam was never told to “tone down” his inflammatory barks.
Tea Partiers should file a class action lawsuit.
Hmm. Maybe my post was not well written? My point was that Levin understands that the notion some people have that because Levin is a public figure Levin cannot sue for slander. He certainly can. he was defamed, lobeled and slandered by various people and they did so with malice.
I think you and I agree:) Levin can take legal action if he wants to.
Sorry, after I re read your comment I thought I probably misunderstood your point.
He has scared the bejeezus out of the low life scum.
Please do excuse the vitriol!!!!
How does Levin feel about tort reform? ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.