Absolutely **NO* NO**NO** mother left the hospital unable to care for her baby. That included diaper changing.
Stanley Ann's so-called "friend", and her bogus story about Stanley Ann being unable to change a diaper, is a great big pile of Marxist, Alinsky, DemocRAT baby poop!" <<<<
Thanks, wintertime --- frankly, among all of the women I've ever met, there are absolutely NO women born in the 1930s/1940s/ and the first half or so of the 1950s who did not know precisely how to diaper a baby, say, by the age of 8, at the latest.
YOU may have run across a few who had to be taught how to care for a baby, but most girls of those decades cared for their younger siblings and/or had many babysitting jobs and/or attending strict Home Economics classes for years where such knowledge was mandatory.
The ONLY reason I can give Stanley Ann's girlfriend ANY credence is that she has a couple weirdos for parents, and she had NO siblings. The one nanny job, in Chicago, when Ann was around 16 years of age - there's no mention of any babies associated with that job.
So..... it isn't entirely impossible to me that MAYBE there were as many as 2-percent of only-child females who were clueless as to how to care for an infant, and that Stanley Ann could be a candidate for same --- and besideswhich, IF she gave birth in an unwed mothers maternity home in British Columbia, perhaps she intended to give Baby Barry up for adoption, and after the birth, had second thoughts, so snuck into the nursery, grabbed her baby, and RAN back to the USA.
Back when there was the video online of Susan Blake, my first impression was that Ann, like most teens (and some dads — you know who you are), just couldn’t be bothered. Like, ewwww, a poopy diaper! So, just push it off onto Susan who grew up changing her siblings’ diapers.