Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charles Krauthammer Is Not Qualified To Talk About Governor Palin
conservatives4palin ^ | 1/01/2011 | Sheya

Posted on 01/01/2011 8:01:28 PM PST by unseen1

When I was growing up, my parents taught me that if you want people to think you’re smart, just shut up. They didn’t encourage me to shut up completely – maybe they should have – but the lesson was: never talk about things you know nothing about and people might think you’re smart.....

.....For several years now, the elites have been trying to fool us in believing that two people, one on the left and one on the right, are very smart people. On the left, we have the President and on the right, we have Charles Krauthammer. We are being led to believe how smart they are but if we’ve learned anything in the past year, it is that both of them may be a lot of things but smart isn’t one of them. Both appear not to have learned this lesson: if you want people to think you’re smart just shut up.

In July 2009, in trying to defend Henry Louis Gates, President Obama started out by saying that he didn’t know the situation and that he hasn’t seen all the facts and yet in the same breath, he went on to accuse the Cambridge police of being stupid. If the President was really as smart as we are led to believe, he would have just done what smart people do: shut up!

This brings me to Mr. Smarty Pants Charles Krauthammer. Yes I call him Mr. Smarty Pants because that’s all Mr. Krauthammer is. Anyone that can go on a marathon degrading someone he knows nothing about is anything but smart.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservatives4palin.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: foxnews; freepressforpalin; ignorantpalinistas; iquitarod; krauthammer; krauthammer4dnc; krauthammer4obama; krauthammer4romney; krauthammervswomen; misogynists4romney; palin; palinkoolaidfactory; pundit; romney; sarahfailin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-319 next last
To: unseen1

I’d say he’s qualified. I hope he’s wrong.


141 posted on 01/01/2011 9:44:29 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

CK unlike Reagan never renounced his democratic past.

So your post is moot.


142 posted on 01/01/2011 9:45:01 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
I don't see a lot of difference between Palinbots, who cannot accept any criticism of her, and those who hang on Krathammer’s every word and think he can do no wrong.

Until reading his bio at the Washington Speakers’ Bureau, I didn't realize that he still wrote for The New Republic. Whether you like and respect Krathammer or not, one thing is clear: he is not a conservative.

143 posted on 01/01/2011 9:45:03 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: train

lol


144 posted on 01/01/2011 9:46:18 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Oh and now the original back-away-from-the-keyboard quip.

Like I said you're on a roll! Can't wait for your next never tried before on a forum gem!

I like shut up smarty pants best, so feel free to throw that out please!
145 posted on 01/01/2011 9:47:14 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Calling him Smarty Pants is hardly an impressive rebuttal.

Oh yeah, well nanner nanner nanner!

146 posted on 01/01/2011 9:47:51 PM PST by JaguarXKE (Life - It's 10 percent circumstances and 90 percent how you react to circumstances - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

lol


147 posted on 01/01/2011 9:48:04 PM PST by train
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221
I have yet to meet a palin support that thinks she can do no wrong. I have seen some that defend her against unfair attacks. But like most supporters Palin supporters will not point out her negatives. which I would expect an Obama supporter to list all of Obama’s negatives either.
148 posted on 01/01/2011 9:48:13 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain

well if you would bother to click the link you would see this as the real rebuttal:

In August 2009 Mr. Krauthammer wrote a column where he started off by asking Governor Palin to leave the room. Then he spent the rest of the article writing exactly what Governor Palin wrote just days before.

On the night of President Obama’s 2010 State of the Union speech, Governor Palin was on Fox News reacting to the speech. The next night, Mr. Krauthammer was on Special Report essentially repeating Governor Palin word by word.

Either Mr. Krauthammer never reads Governor Palin’s columns, in which case by his standards he is as stupid as she is, or he just plagiarizes her every word.

If Mr. Krauthammer had actually read anything by Governor Palin, he would know that Governor Palin has covered every single topic and issue facing the country.

Does Charles ask the same questions about Governor Palin’s potential 2012 rivals? You know the ones he so admires and believes are more qualified to take on President Obama? Have any of those weighed in on as many issues as Governor Palin? If so, can he point them to me? Maybe I missed them. That may actually explain why Mr. Krauthammer prefers them to Governor Palin. It’s much easier just to read one or two op-eds a year by someone than to read the writings of someone every day.

Ever since President Clinton noted how “smart” Mr. Krauthammer is, Charles has been bending over backwards to appease the left. Lately he’s been going as far as praising President Obamas’ intelligence. Of course he would praise his peer on the left, sort of an “I’ll scratch your back, you scratch my back” deal.

There are a lot of things Charles Krauthammer is more qualified to talk about than I am and for those things I don’t understand, I do the smart thing and do not involve myself in them. When it comes to Governor Palin, I would take on Mr. Krauthammer every day of the week. Until he studies up on Governor Palin’s writings and positions, Mr. Krauthammer should just shut up and maybe once again people will be fooled to believe that he’s as smart as we are led to believe. In the meantime, when it comes to Governor Palin, Charles Krauthammer should do the smart thing: leave the room or just shut up. Otherwise he is either just stupid or simply a plagiarizer.


149 posted on 01/01/2011 9:50:18 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Third time:

Why won't you address my point if you're so correct?

Why do you accept the talking points of someone who was a liberal speech writer?

*Awaiting answer*

150 posted on 01/01/2011 9:50:18 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
His comments never serve conservatism

Wrong. Try again.

Terror — and Candor: The administration's denial of "radical Islam" is dangerous, dishonest, and demoralizing

Obama’s Second Act: If he wins another term, he'll only get worse.

151 posted on 01/01/2011 9:50:31 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
His comments never serve conservatism

Wrong. Try again.

Terror — and Candor: The administration's denial of "radical Islam" is dangerous, dishonest, and demoralizing

Obama’s Second Act: If he wins another term, he'll only get worse.

152 posted on 01/01/2011 9:50:47 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
As a matter of fact, if you go back and read the posts on this thread (and on just about any thread on this website) you’ll find some well reasoned commentary against Krauthammer.

This thread is an embarrassment. And note that commentary "against Krauthammer" is not a valid argument against what he has written. It's nothing more than ad hominem silliness.

153 posted on 01/01/2011 9:51:14 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: train

Perhaps Mr. Krauthammer does not live in the past but in the present.

While ones past is part of history and cannot be changed or altered (unless you are a revisionist liberal), it should not be used as a tattoo to forever label someone either.

People change over time.

Most people as they age turn conservative or lean toward more conservative values and principles.

Why is that?

It is because having lived so long, the people come to realize the truth and facts and have lived them and lived through them and realize what is important in their lives and what is not.


154 posted on 01/01/2011 9:52:21 PM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
His initial arguments against her were that she was “unprepared.” This was based on nothing other than the opinions of other individuals in the media. (Palin obliterated Krauthammer’s opinion, as we all know.)

Sarah Palin on the Couric interview: "I don't blame people for thinking that I was unprepared for the office after watching that," Palin said.


155 posted on 01/01/2011 9:53:17 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

Again CK has not renounced his liberal past.


156 posted on 01/01/2011 9:54:07 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

But these comments do nothing for conservatism, because all conservatives agree with them already. You see what I mean?

He doesn’t move the ball forward, and very often he throws it to the other team.


157 posted on 01/01/2011 9:54:37 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Rules will never work for radicals (liberals) because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

I could forgive Krauthammer if he would just apologize to Sarah Palin. It would be harder to forgive him for the smear job he used on Christine O’Donnell.


158 posted on 01/01/2011 9:56:31 PM PST by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

lol I don’t answer “when did you stop beating your wife” questions. Nor would i consider anything you say to me more than pure silliness. So there’s that


159 posted on 01/01/2011 9:57:41 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: unseen1
Krathammer is a Washington insider who wants the elites to admire him. He realizes that one of the best ways to accomplish that is by bashing Sarah Palin.

I am sure the fact that “death panels” made headlines across the country and nearly scuttled ObamaCare while his columns had little impact doesn't make him like her either.

160 posted on 01/01/2011 9:57:41 PM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson