Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: b_sharp
I know many ex-navy personnel and have talked to them about this issue and some have admitted to being part of a man over board mission. This was done against gay peeps who could not control their deviant desires while on board. The mission involved stealth, surprise, restraint, a splash and in the morning someone missing role call. This all happened in the late 70’s & early 80’s.

I fear that the policy now will put many more good men in jeopardy, not the faggots but those who the WILL be propositioned by those deviants without the fear of any action of their commanders. They know that they will be able to do what they want because of the damned Political Correctness crap. I also do believe that the PC belief of being untouchable because of their perversion will result in a lot of training accidents.

My thoughts only

SledgeCS

27 posted on 12/18/2010 9:34:57 PM PST by SledgeCS (If this is an example of a transparent government, I would hate to see what a secret one is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SledgeCS; All

“I know many ex-navy personnel and have talked to them about this issue and some have admitted to being part of a man over board mission. This was done against gay peeps who could not control their deviant desires while on board. The mission involved stealth, surprise, restraint, a splash and in the morning someone missing role call. This all happened in the late 70’s & early 80’s”

You mean to tell me they tied the gay guy up and threw him overboard where he became food for the sharks!? Aw come on, that’s going too far. I’d be pretty annoyed if a gay was making passes at me, but the furthest I would go would be to punch him in the face if he wouldn’t quit.

“I also do believe that the PC belief of being untouchable because of their perversion will result in a lot of training accidents.”

I remember Michael Savage talking about this once: “Imagine if you had two guys in the shower together and one of them happens to be gay. Now without getting too graphic, suppose that a certain part of his body does something that he can’t control. And suppose that the other guy is some redneck from Arkansas who isn’t inclined to be PC and tolerant. He’s liable to get upset and do something to that gay man that’s not very pretty.”


61 posted on 12/18/2010 10:17:13 PM PST by Strk321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: SledgeCS

Spot on.

Every time someone wants to disobey an order, they will claim to be gay, and will claim discrimination.

No one will give orders to an openly gay man, especially the career types, for fear of the fallout on their own heads.

Being gay will now be a shield, to do whatever, and whenever you want to, without having to worry about your superiors disciplining you in any way shape or form.

This is what was intended, and this is what they got.

It was a way to destroy the military, so it can be rebuilt from a liberal standpoint, thereby giving the liberals control of the armed forces in a decade or so, when they will use them against American citizens. There was no way our current military would turn against us at the orders of a socialist, but a new military, created from liberalism is just what they needed.

Good bye America as we know it.


108 posted on 12/19/2010 2:27:04 AM PST by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: SledgeCS

Sledge, that is EXACTLY what is going to happen. My dad was in the Navy and he had similar stories about the “queers”. Close quarters and homos don’t mix.


140 posted on 12/19/2010 9:38:13 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson