To: Walter Scott Hudson
Wow. These groups really are going off the deep end. Why are the Hispanic groups getting involved in a Spaniard couples desire to have a baby in America. They both have lived in America for years and DEFINITELY pay huge taxes to the U.S. so it is not like they are living off the government having a baby. This is the dumbest story of the day. Perhaps they are pissed that they are married.
To: Walter Scott Hudson
At least it will be an ATTRACTIVE anchor baby, and one that won’t need welfare benefits until it is 18 years old.
3 posted on
12/15/2010 8:16:36 AM PST by
La Lydia
To: Walter Scott Hudson
The term anchor baby is equivalent to other defamatory terms such as wetback, pickaninny and tar baby. Oh, please! Get over it.
4 posted on
12/15/2010 8:19:00 AM PST by
econjack
(Some people are as dumb as soup.)
To: Walter Scott Hudson
The term anchor baby is incorrectly used here. As Cruz is a US citizen, her baby would have US citizenship even if born outside the US. “Anchor baby” refers to the US born child of two illegals.
5 posted on
12/15/2010 8:19:39 AM PST by
iowamark
To: Walter Scott Hudson
If it makes you feel any better, the Spanish newspapers are hating on them for this decision, as are the people who comment on the Spanish newspaper websites. They are being pilloried for their lack of patriotism and loyalty to Spain.
Example: "MUCHO patriotismo, pero el bebe que sea YANQUI !!! Viva la doble moral! no se puede ser más hipócrita...pues que lo tengan en usa y no vuelvan más!"
7 posted on
12/15/2010 8:22:27 AM PST by
La Lydia
To: Walter Scott Hudson
It is the assertion that, if someone is offended by an argument or the language used to articulate it, the argument is inherently incorrect.Inaccurate. PC is only concerned with whether members of certain groups, the Designated Victim Groups (DVGs), are offended.
Offending members of Designated Oppressor Groups (DOGs) is a good thing.
To: Walter Scott Hudson
10 posted on
12/15/2010 8:28:26 AM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(0bama thought he'd find "common ground" on 0bamaCare because of ROMNEYCARE!)
To: Walter Scott Hudson
When will we actually start winning battles against these parasites?
11 posted on
12/15/2010 8:30:30 AM PST by
skeeter
To: Walter Scott Hudson
15 posted on
12/15/2010 8:52:18 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Walter Scott Hudson
They can always change the channel. The world is never going to be able to accommodate everybody at the same time.
To: Walter Scott Hudson
Progressives can’t have to much cultural Marxism.
22 posted on
12/15/2010 9:25:36 AM PST by
Vaduz
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
24 posted on
12/15/2010 9:29:25 AM PST by
HiJinx
(I can see Mexico from the back porch...)
To: Walter Scott Hudson
This is not an anchor baby. An anchor baby is what illegal aliens have in order to cement their ability to stay here and not be deported...due to the little bambino being an American citizen
Cruz and her husband are in no danger of being deported they have work visas and legal US residency
This is still an abuse of our outdated birthright laws from the 14th Amendment. This is called birth tourism and Asians have been doing this for years. Not that I like any of this
25 posted on
12/15/2010 9:43:49 AM PST by
dennisw
(- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confucius)
To: Walter Scott Hudson
Just don’t flip a coin with the expectant father.
26 posted on
12/15/2010 10:06:32 AM PST by
gusty
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson