Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

Here’s a question for those that believe this “impact caused axial tilt” -

why do you assume that the “original” axial tilt was 0?


34 posted on 12/09/2010 5:45:04 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

> “why do you assume that the “original” axial tilt was 0?”

.
They don’t have any idea what they are saying.

If the tilt were anything different than what it is, life would be impossible. There would be a constant wind blowing from west to east (opposite to the apparent sun motion)


36 posted on 12/09/2010 10:22:20 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson