Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Defense of Hillary Clinton Against the WikiLeaks, and Why She Should Resign
www.jimbyrd.com ^ | 12/02/2010 | Jim Byrd

Posted on 12/03/2010 7:00:29 AM PST by jim byrd

I am not a Democrat, never have been; never liked Hillary Clinton, still don't. But in one regard, she deserves respect for at least trying to protect America's interests. I find the current Democratic Party at best despicable, and at worst anti-American, with an agenda that is antithetical to what this country was founded upon. But after reading the WikiLeaks regarding the State Department and Hillary Clinton, bravo for her. Bravo for Hillary Clinton. What the WikiLeaks revealed was that she has done what should be expected from the Secretary of State regarding national security. Hopefully there were more justifiably devious exploits she employed that were not captured on paper, and hopefully they will never emerge from their cryptic resting place.

(Excerpt) Read more at jimbyrd.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: julianassange; nationalsecurity; wikileaks

1 posted on 12/03/2010 7:00:37 AM PST by jim byrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jim byrd

She might see opportunity in this. Resign from Secretary of State due to Wiki and then begin running for the Democratic Nomination....people really don’t care about this Wiki thing.....most people don’t even understand it.


2 posted on 12/03/2010 7:01:44 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd

Hillary’s job just got much harder. The WikiLeaks dump has reduced the flow of diplomatic discourse to a trickle. Damage control is the current priority, and the barrage of embarrassing revelations seems likely to continue. The inevitable plea to “review security procedures” has been made, and the obligatory call to “bring Assange to justice” has been issued.

While gravely detrimental to America and her interests, it is also a golden opportunity for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to make the transition from State Department to exploratory committee. Here’s how she makes opportunity from this crisis:

While true that this WikiLeaks debacle is potent and far-reaching, even the most fantastic news story eventually fades from the front page. Meanwhile, Madame Secretary will have ample camera time to look presidential. The Obama administration, conversely, will try to shield the President from Assange’s outrage. As a result, in the coming weeks, Hillary will have a chance to resign somewhat gracefully while leaving President Obama with an ugly diplomatic mess for bonus points. Would she do it?

Why not? The public would not focus blame on Clinton for one important reason. Julian Assange. Assange gives Secretary Clinton a bogeyman to point to. After all, she did all she could. She said all the right things. Foreign leaders would likely praise her brand of negotiating, effectively endorsing her probable candidacy. To top it off, she would likely have amassed a compendium of unflattering diplomatic anecdotes relating to President Obama. That would be some industrial grade campaign ammunition, if there’s enough of it.

President Obama would then be left with the task of quickly filling this vital vacancy. With his approval ratings in the toilet, any choice would face intense scrutiny. Not exactly what a first-term President needs with the 2012 campaigns looming. His weakness is showing publicly as well, as polls are showing the President in a virtual tie with some presumptive republican candidates.

WikiLeaks aside, President Obama was dealt a serious political blow on November 2nd, and will likely be bloodied by an investigation-prone House Of Representatives. Even the progressive financier George Soros recently said, “...if this president can’t do what we need, it is time to start looking somewhere else.” That statement reverberated far and wide through the global political spectrum.

President Obama may not be quite ready to throw in the towel, but Madame Secretary will soon be beautifully poised to deliver a knockout blow.


3 posted on 12/03/2010 7:05:10 AM PST by astuddis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd
never liked Hillary Clinton, still don't . . . find the current Democratic Party at best despicable

That's pretty much how I feel about Hillary. She is despicable and obviously wants to rule the United States as an absolute tyrant. In her defense though, Hillary wants absolute power over a strong America, where we are her servants in a powerful 1984-style totalitarian state, and that puts her way above the rest of the Dems, most of whom want a weak America with Obama ruling over the dissolution of America as a distinct and relevant country.

4 posted on 12/03/2010 7:05:18 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd

Hillary is not concerned about national security. When Wikileaks made Bush look bad she and Obama were okay with it. When Hillary looked bad, she fights her LEFTWING cohorts (Wiki-commies).

Now that Obama is taking hits, he discovers he has law enforcement agencies under his authority. HILLARY AND OBAMA ARE BOTH COMMUNIST GARBAGE.


5 posted on 12/03/2010 7:10:38 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd

There’s more to this WikiLeaks crap than what’s on the surface.
1-Did this PFC really have access to the DECRYPTED versions of these messages? Seems poor policy or dereliction of duty or incompetence at best, treason at worst.
2-Or, did this guy Assage manage to decrypt our messages, which would point to a BIG problem, a John Walker style problem with our communications.


6 posted on 12/03/2010 7:20:45 AM PST by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd
Funny how everyone ridiculed Obama about his goofy "Office of the President Elect" charade, but at least he was elected.

Hillary on the other hand actively tried to push through health care legislation by virtue of being the President's Wife !

Hillary's ego is several orders of magnitude larger than Obama's

7 posted on 12/03/2010 7:20:49 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic one Post at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Hillary Clinton even by accident doesn’t have a prayer of acting beyond her own self-interest, which is what I believe you are also saying. She must shutter to think how she missed the prezidential boat at this particular time, when it turns out that Americans were so ripe and eager for the picking by communists, marxists, totalitarians, et.al., and Herself had no clue how ready we were to collapse our own nation.

Most telling is, of course, the lines at airports indicating just how benign as a people we are. Willing Americans, to board a plane, will subject themselves to searches without cause, anatomical exposure to x-rays, and moral embarrassment. The Jews boarded, in similar compliance, the trains to their own high temp cleansing, but at least they were lied to. We show up at the airport
knowing full well the humiliation awaiting us. Hope it isn’t a grand scheme to get us on the trains eventually, because if so, we will willingly go—that’s been proven.


8 posted on 12/03/2010 7:26:27 AM PST by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd

Don’t cry for Hillary, America

She pinnacled out as a wannabe power behind the throne in the alterative national command centert she established in the West Wing when she was FLOTUS

But...not a bad run for a homely ambiguously heterosexual male-angry gal from Illinois who transplanted to the Ivies, and learned to keep her men for ambition and keep her women for comfort. Looking at the wreckage of her brother’s lives, guess she showed Daddy Rodham who was the real Rodham with balls.

- wife of Governor, Wife of President, carpet bagger replacement for Daniel Patrick Moynihan, dragonlady replacement for Condi Rice

Not to mention 2 mansions and enough pilfered or gifted art and silver to overdecorate both of them


9 posted on 12/03/2010 7:30:15 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd
The reason she should resign is that she failed to protect US diplomatic interests. The first of these Wikileaks were done months ago and apparently no one in the administration or especially the DOJ has done anything to better secure US secrets or seek out and prosecute those who leaked them. That 22 year old Army private should be looking at a death sentence for treason and those responsible for giving this twerp easy access to everything including diplomatic information should also be prosecuted for derilection of duty.

I fail to understand why such a low level soldier should have had access to such a vast array of US secrets when he had no need to know them and that this information could be simply copied onto a flash drive. I can't believe that we don't secure our secret information any better than that. This situation is about like leaving your bank account, tax and personal information in an unencrypted folder on a computer at the public library.

10 posted on 12/03/2010 7:33:26 AM PST by The Great RJ (The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim byrd
The reason she should resign is that she failed to protect US diplomatic interests. The first of these Wikileaks were done months ago and apparently no one in the administration or especially the DOJ has done anything to better secure US secrets or seek out and prosecute those who leaked them. That 22 year old Army private should be looking at a death sentence for treason and those responsible for giving this twerp easy access to everything including diplomatic information should also be prosecuted for dereliction of duty.

I fail to understand why such a low level soldier should have had access to such a vast array of US secrets when he had no need to know them and that this information could be simply copied onto a flash drive. I can't believe that we don't secure our secret information any better than that. This situation is about like leaving your bank account, tax and personal information in an unencrypted folder on a computer at the public library.

11 posted on 12/03/2010 7:34:33 AM PST by The Great RJ (The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

The leaks happened, and were allowed to happen by the Obama white house. Remember, the leaks were sent to the WH and the WH refused to look at them.

Now, they enjoyed the leaks getting out on GW, and they allowed damage to occur that would make Hillary look bad (taking her out of the running against BO) but now, the leaks my embarrass Obama, so all of the sudden they want them stopped.

This was controlled damage, mainly to the enemies of Obama IMHO and it has Chicago style politics written all over it. It happens here all the time, leaks get out to the press that cause more damage to your enemies then to you yourself, and Obama has been a master of that game since he first ran for office here in Illinois.

No dem cared when it endangered our troops, Obama didn’t care when it embarassed the republicans, Obama didn’t even talk about it when the shit hit the fan and it was making Hillary look bad, but now they shut down the servers, and they are trying to stop everything.

Timing is everything, and in this case, the timing smells like a RAT doing what RATs do. Hillary was bested, and made to look a fool, to prevent her from using any information she had gleaned over the last couple of years against Obama.

He nullified her “experience”, now no one can give her credit for handling the state department well.

The game has been played, and Obama is calling “Check”.


12 posted on 12/03/2010 7:43:12 AM PST by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
There’s more to this WikiLeaks crap than what’s on the surface. 1-Did this PFC really have access to the DECRYPTED versions of these messages? Seems poor policy or dereliction of duty or incompetence at best, treason at worst. 2-Or, did this guy Assage manage to decrypt our messages, which would point to a BIG problem, a John Walker style problem with our communications.

You Sir just won the prize. Why in the hell would a PFC have such total access to this information. Something is not right!

13 posted on 12/03/2010 7:44:06 AM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: astuddis

You know all of that sounds great, but bottom line is look who casts the vote


14 posted on 12/03/2010 8:05:25 AM PST by mel (since progressive is code word for anti- i am a progressive progressive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson