Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slightly expand the House: The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929 has outlived its usefulness
coachisright.com ^ | DECEMBER 3RD, 2010 | Kevin “Coach” Collins

Posted on 12/03/2010 6:21:03 AM PST by jmaroneps37

Expanding the House is an idea whose time has come. Using a slightly different formula for apportioning Congressional seats would give us a House that is much more in line with American values.

So much of what the federal government does is based on merely what the federal government wants to do rather than what the Founding Fathers designed. This makes it hard to separate original intent from political whim.

For instance, we take for granted that United States Senators must be elected. Yet before the passage of the 17th Amendment in 1913 states were free to elect or select their Senators.

We also believe the rule requiring only 435 members in the House of Representatives is inviolable. Nevertheless, this cap is in place only because the Congress passed The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929. The Founding Fathers had no such vision; in fact the very purpose of the Census was as a way to periodically reapportion and expand the House to reflect changes in population.

Montanans’ votes worth less

The Founding Fathers would never approve of Montana having one Representative serving 958,000 people and Rhode Island with only 100,000 more residents having two Representatives each serving only 530,000 people.

Besides making Montanans’ votes count for less, this provides a built-in advantage for Rhode Island and other out of step liberal places like New York City. Mega districts like Montana has virtually insure substandard service from their lone Representative.

While still much too high, setting the Congressional district population limit at roughly 700,000 should work better and provide us with a Congress more reflective of the will of the people. Certainly the very Blue Rhode Island doesn’t come near reflecting the….

More..

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: reapportionment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: dirtboy

Thus the compromise - One house equal representation for the states, the other house equal representation by population.


21 posted on 12/03/2010 8:17:16 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mo

“They can stay in their districts..and meet electronically”

Yea! It ought to be that way right now! We don’t need a DC, not with the communications we have now.


22 posted on 12/03/2010 8:21:38 AM PST by pepperdog (Why are Democrats Afraid of a Voter ID Law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson