http://pizzatraysandbeerbottles.blogspot.com/2010/12/fun.html
To: AustralianConservative
2 posted on
12/02/2010 5:31:27 AM PST by
Past Your Eyes
(I'd open it myself but I don't have any thumbs.)
To: AustralianConservative
Lamh Foistenach Abu!
3 posted on
12/02/2010 5:35:11 AM PST by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN '69 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: AustralianConservative
Brian Wilton is taking an underwear posito ioon kilts which is pure fabrication. The tradition of Scotland ius that nothing is worn under, and in the British military nothing is worn under the kilt.In the Scottish Highland Regiments , if a socldier is caught wearing anything under kilt, it is cause for dress demerits and punishment.
So Brian Wilty Wilton is nothing but a softy Brit trying to redefine Scotland as uncivilized. There are reasons for not wearing anything under.
http://www.coool-stuff.com/what-do-men-wear-under-their-kilts/
4 posted on
12/02/2010 5:46:50 AM PST by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
To: AustralianConservative
Then there’s the woman who asked a Scot soldier if anything was worn under his kilt.
“Nay, lassie,” he replied. “It’s as good as it ever was!”
cheers
Jim
6 posted on
12/02/2010 7:45:45 AM PST by
gymbeau
(Free Tibet! (Limit two per customer))
To: AustralianConservative
Any idea how the term “going commando” came to mean not wearing any underwear?
10 posted on
12/02/2010 1:24:09 PM PST by
Ditter
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson